Hmm, the plot is good, but the chapter 1 very looks familiar as an anime fan (Mashoku Tensei anime)— that's the initial memory comes to mind when I've seen chapter 1.
The artists also said utilized AI in the art production, but some said that it uses less AI in the recent chapters (more felt humanly...? Idk I'm not an artist).
Some dropped this manhwa due to these reasons. Moreover, knowing the fact this is a harem.
It is a BIT concerning, but the plot is interesting & unique, the flow is balanced as well not too cliche, the MC is hella funny and OP too, the females aren't annoying instead they're very useful, smart, wise and strong too, and the art is decent if compared to others, so I will stay.
Those are some weird accusations there. It's nothing like Mashoku Tensei at all. Only the first 2 pages of the first chapter have a slight resemblance to it. But "shown as a baby and then a small child looking out the window at the world" is so generic that it could be multiple isekai manga. And there's literally no harem going on at all.
Nah the first part where it was shown that he was reborn is really similar to mushoku tensei, watch it and compare them, they're too similar frame by frame... But at least that's the only thing plagiarized, the rest are new
I've read a few isekai that started in very similar ways. And considering how this one lost all resemblance after the first 2 pages, the author should be given the benefit of the doubt imo. As in, I doubt he stole the scenes in those first 2 pages and instead just had a similar vision for how he wanted his story to start.
Yes, it could be but you can't deny that some of the frames from the anime was plagiarized in some of the panels of the manhwa, oorrrrr maybe it was the ai they used that made the first chapters similar to the anime
The reviews are a bit concerning... Can someone tell me what they mean by 'plagiarized' and 'ai'?