No, it may look like it but it’s not. Here’s a summary:
- Yoonjae is the son of the ML’s dad’s first love so when she died, he took Yoonjae
- For a long time, the older brother and ML thought that Yoonjae is on their family registry but turns out to be not
- I don’t know if this happened before or after the revealed story of the two (I think before bcs the ML seems to think that Yoonjae is his brother), so he probably thought Yoonjae is their brother in the papers.
- Yoonjae is NOT adopted nor legally recognized to belong in the family.
Hope this helps
I don't think they were triggered I think they were just telling it how it is lol. What I don't get about people trying to say it's not incest or the age gap isn't weird- you know it's a kink thing right? The author themselves has the characters talk about how fucked it up it is so why are you guys trying so hard to make it seem normal and innocent? If they werent doing something wrong, why do you think the characters keep talking about how messed up it is? The elder literally just introduced the mc to him as his younger brother cause.. that's what he is to him and on top of that, he raised him since he was 5.. then asked him to call him papa in bed.. But it's not incest to you, right? right..
People are into the brocon/incest plot, thats fine but just own it instead of trying to justify it. And btw we aren't in the comments section of spilled blood trashing it rn, we're responding to a comment about incest cause you and some other person downplayed the incest and we don't want the person who asked to get blindsided.
If only I could like responses! Yes, I’m definitely not triggered, just telling straight up how the actual story is. And you’re completely right with your comment!!! Fully agree.
@jayjay you’re trying to explain how they’re not blood related, but it still makes it incest bc they consider each other as family and fully call each other brothers (and this is not including the whole, eldest bro raising the yoonjae since he was like 5, basically acting as parent/guardian). Next time, just explain it how it actually is
You really weren't telling it how it actually was though. You said it wasnt incest and downplayed everything. If your opinion is that it isn't incest because they aren't blood related, you gotta explain that but also give the missing context. Like the fact he raised him since 5 years old and that they both consider each other siblings
wait hold up, the side couple is incest???