well it's out now, ppl have been saying it for a while but what i don't understand is that...

but even if it's to say he needed more evidence, or he wasn't sure and didn't want to hurt leo bc she trusted her a lot..

i mean she's already hurt enough as it is, if he could sound out connie like that from the beginning, cutting her early in the bud would've had lesser repercussions.

the only pay off to that decision is......shock value lol

(idk i'm babbling i'm kinda drunk sorry lmao)

Wait I don't remember her seeing connie after Leo went to the dukedom

She went to the orphanage several times to see the others kids andvConnie

Connie went to visit the duke one time in s1. And she met leo when leo arrived from a party. And i think she interacted with connie when she visits the kids sometimes. But yea, phileo dont have enough evidence and he didnt suspect connie at first hence she was free for a long time. It was only when he discovered leo’s mom’s ties to the orphanage and the state of the previously ‘adopted’ kids that he became sure, which took sometime to investigate since they had their hands busy with the capital and the baby monster traffickers.

OMG that Connie bitch!!! What did she dooooooo

wait i'm even more confused now, bc i thought the duke had connie become leo's attentedant maid. so she's with her the entire time they've been in the dukedom

are there 2 connies in the story then?

Unspeakable crime, obsession, a child traficker, and murderer, hides her crimes and her rotten personality. Shes actuall the opposite of everything leo thought she was. Shes not kind nor good, and frankly has a lose screw in her head psychopath

Now I'm rlly curious what she will say to Leo and how she is going down

What!!! Noooooo that another conniiieeee

huh..now why tf would the author put two connies in a story lmao
but thanks, i've been so confused this entire time!!

Riiiight I'm not sure, it is either the translation or honestly I have no other reason