The revenges are satisfying but tbh I don't like how the male characters get a normal deat...

Well.....he got penetrated by a log of wood tho???

It was sharpened as well

But was it rape? Could you define it like this: unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against a person's will?? Where is the sexual nature? It was just assault, plain and simple. There's a torture method using bamboo where they plant a bamboo shoot under a person's butt. When the bamboo grows, it grows through their butt and through their intestines. Would you call that rape?

Is you bitch dumb or are you doing it on purpose ??? Cuz my whole point was that rape is not about sex it’s a weapon used to assert control and inflict harm. Rape is a violent act aimed at overpowering and dehumanizing the victim. Sexual gratification isn’t the motivation; it’s the aggressor’s desire to exert dominance and instill fear. Again sex is about lust and sexual desire while rape is about destroying and harming the victims

You dumbass is mixing everything up. Legally speaking’s if I put a anything in your butt WITHOUT your consent it is rape no matter if it’s a man dick or a chopstick. That’s how the law work if you got a problem with it go take it out with them "non-consensual penetration with any object or body part in someone’s genitals or other intimate areas is considered a form of rape or sexual assault "

There we go. By definition "Rape was long considered to be caused by unbridled sexual desire, but it is now understood as a pathological assertion of power over a victim", so technically he was raped as well. And "Rape is defined in most jurisdictions as sexual intercourse, or other forms of sexual penetration, committed by a perpetrator against a victim without their consent", notice that it said "in most jurisdictions". There are inconsistent definition of the word rape depending on how you wanna use that word. One thing for sure is that you can consider it as rape if the victim was taken advantaged of with regards that the victim did not give consent to whatever was done to them. Anddd the first dude was forcibly penetrated bro( ´-｀) just because Shirayuki wasn't really into it and that he didnt go whack pervy shit doesn't mean it wasnt sexual. If the victim feels that they got defiled by their perpetrator, it's rape period(charrrr).

Well seems like you're the kind of person set on making your own definitions and calling other people a bitch for not agreeing with you. In fact, the law is not that black and white where putting something in someone's genitals without their permission is rape. For example, there was a case where a man aimed pressurized water at someone's butt as a joke and later the man who got the water aimed at his butt died because his internal organs exploded. The man who was the perpetrator got charged with murder, but not rape. Why? Because there was no sexual intent. You just think too black and white, thank goodness you're not a lawyer or your client would never get their justice

Exactly. SEXUAL penetration. You seem to miss that connotation. Again, I'll provide another example where something was inserted in the genitals forcibly and it wasn't considered rape: there was a case where a man aimed pressurized water at someone's butt as a joke and later the man who got the water aimed at his butt died because his internal organs exploded. The man who was the perpetrator got charged with murder, but not rape. Why? Because there was no sexual intent.

Also, "If the victim feels that they got defiled by their perpetrator, it's rape period"??? That's just... not how it works. That's how you get cases of false accusations against people who didn't commit those vile acts

When can you exactly say that it was or it wasn't dpne sexually?

Based on the actions and intent? Sure, if the ML had shoved the wood stick up and down inside him in a sexual manner or even expressed any sexual intent then it would be rape. But this is the equivalent to having an axe on the ground facing up and splitting a tree stump in half by bashing it against the axe

Those deaths were not normal.

Ok, I'll be more specific. "Non-sexual"

Yes any UNLAWFUL SEXUAL ACTIVITY is rape. Did you read that after copy pasted from dictionary?

Yes I did, because what he did wasn't sexual. Did you read the two examples I provided that proved than just because something was unconsensually put in their genitals, doesn't make it rape? I don't feel like writing it all again so maybe take your time reading everything in this thread if you're gonna argue with me

Dude, I will not be arguing with you that's stupid, it's your opinion, and it's fine. It would be a waste of time to continue where can we just read or not read.....Going off track, this manga isn't that wild compared to other manga, manhuas...and Chinese novels now that will make you question everything.

yes it is UNLAWFUL SEXUAL ACTIVITY did you read what you copy pasted from dictionary?

Killed on the wrong relay. The point still stands it is your opinion and it's fine.

Are you being deadass rn cuz putting there is a whole fucking difference between this case and the ml putting a fucking wooden stick up this guy ass. Mind you you were the one who started being passive aggressive when I didn’t say anything wrong nor false everything I said about rape is backed up by the fucking law once again if you don’t like it go to the nearest police station and take it out with them

I even gave you the legal definition but I guess you know better than lawyers. You are completely ignoring the examples I gave you and making up a definition for rape. Face it, you ARE wrong and everything you said ISN'T backed up by the law. You said that anything forcibly put into the genitals is rape. I gave you an example that proved otherwise, where the LAW said otherwise. I cannot see how you are so blind as to insist that you're right when I gave you outside sources and facts, while you constantly made up a definition about rape that fit whatever mold you wanted to create