How is this grooming if they're mentally all the same age it is weird that the author decided to make him a teacher tho like why couldn't they have been both students...or even both adults??
That's like saying "you're really mature for your age"
Bro no the fuck it isn't??? A "mature" 12 is still a 12 year old and has only been that or younger.
In her case, she LITERALLY has all the memories and experiences of her past life. So she's mentally NOT 16 or whatever age her body is.
By your definition, someone who has a hormone imbalance and is stuck in a prepubescent body shouldn't be treated by their mental age either??
Like those two things are sooooo not comparable it's laughable you even brought it up. It's pedo bullshit apologist behavior, don't even.
You're not reading. I said it IS pedophilic. IT IS grooming. You get a grip.
By saying, "no it isn't grooming" is the most out of touch statement I've ever seen.
Don't bring mental age and hormonal imbalance here. A child, despite being mature, is still a child. And a child pursued by a grown ass adult is called a victim.
And you're not thinking. YOU get a grip ffs
Oh, denying untrue statements is out of touch?
Honey open a dictionary first because you speak next time ok? It's kind of embarrassing when people use words they don't understand and then don't even have the decency to own up to it afterwards. I feel like English isn't your first language, and if it is...that's even worse lol
Girl nobody be arguing about children irl. IM TALKIBG ABOUT THIS STORY WHERE A FULL GROWN ASS WOMAN WAKES UP IN THE BODY OF A CHILD.
Grooming is when an adult predatorily molds an impressionable person (child) to their tastes to manipulate them into doing romantic or sexual acts. The problem is that such people don't understand what they are consenting to and therefore CAN'T.
I already said I found it weird as well. But calling it grooming it is just FALSE because that's not what is happening here.
Also? You are weirdly combatant and argumentative about this. It's good to have a strong moral standing and not put up with any kind of bullshit when it comes to sa and pedofilia but maybe next time actually read up and understand what you're talking about? I wish others would reply to this and give you a reality check.
By your logic, when you read a transmigration manhwa and the GROWN ass 30 year old dies and transmigrated into the body of some 5 year old and THEN gets a crush on another five year old, that's not grooming or pedofilia? Cause that's clearly a case of grooming to me. Mental age>physical age
So what is it then? Cause you can't have it both ways.
Is the situation here grooming or is it the one where the mentally 30 year old women has a crush on a 5 year old grooming because by admitting one you're denying the other.
Think mark, think!!!
You clearly lacking in regards of media literacy or nuance. I get why people would consume anything as it is just media, but denying and justifying when clearly something is blatantly out there is hella weird. You can justify it all you want but her being a child doesn't change a thing. Mental > Physical my ass.
This isn't just about grooming, It's about being downright predatorial. It is fucking weird. But I do get why people would still read it. Coz it's just fiction. But you're getting riled up over the fact that both MCs, however they're related in the past, is on a full reset, with concerning age bracket are okay is beyond me. It doesn't matter if they fucked in past life or not. The girl is nothing but a child who just happens to know her past life on the current setting. The instance doesn't really help with their story, no? I'd get it if you don't find it disturbing. If I can't get through you then that's not my fault really.
You're putting words in my mouth. From me being a pedophilia-apologist and etc. Instead of telling me think, why don't you not only read, but comprehend. It would really help a lot.
Ok then respond to my question. In those transmigration stories where the mc goes to another world with all the knowledge of a 30 year old, it's it or is it not weird to like a fucking 10 year old when their mental maturity is so much older even IF they are physically 10.
Answer me that.
Relevance? Yes it is weird. Did I stated otherwise?
Bro, now you're changing your words. Your comment- the one I responded to- is complaining about grooming. THAT is why I responded to you- because I didagreed-.
I'm not saying it isn't predatorial- he fucking killed her in their past life and now wants something out of her.
I'm not defending this. It's weird when authors decide to write about age gaps but that doesn't make it the characters faults. Its weird to me to imagine a kid with an adult even if they're both mentally adults but they're literally not together here so I don't get why you're talking about it now. She literally JUST got over him killing all her friends and family lmao? She's not thinking of romance now.
What? Sorry, if that's how I came across then I apologize. Pedophilia is a horrible thing and I don't think you're defending that. I disagree with you but I do think your arguments come from a place of care towards protecting children.
The thing is I've known you're not entiredly wrong. You said grooming is bad. I agree, you're totally right. I did think you're clearly aware of that too.
Do I agree that the MC and ML's situation is predatory? Yes. Where you strongly disagreed on and saying it's false. So I then replied, "that's like saying you're really mature for your age" which you then strongly denied in essay that it's not the case for these two . You also brought up unrelated or unsuggested statements that doesn't really help with your defense. You brought this strawhat imaginary hater as me, call it argumentative (when I clearly wasn't) and put words on their mouth just because someone (me) beg to differ. I didn't stutter, I believe I made myself clear, but it felt like it was auto-filled that I said stuff I clearly never stated or implied, convincing me that the situation is not problematic.
Fiction has it's own twists and turns, and I get that. But a child is a child. Anyone can grow up ahead anyone mentally. But it doesn't change that it is still—in fact, a child. And predatory when pursued by the person who's supposed to be an adult even if they knew each other on past life. If they're really both adults mentally, they would know that it's inappropriate. There's no false statement in that as you claimed to be. So it concerned me how you think that I'm lying by saying that and that's not the case here. But I thought that's whatever, In the end it's just a piece of fictional media thankfully. Did I think everyone who reads it stop reading it just because I think it's problematic? I believe not. This is the nuance I'm trying to pertain. I've dropped this manga for a while now, and this topic was related to the chapter I've last read, not knowing how it developed. I may not agree and I do believe otherwise nor do I believe it wasn't a fact. I hope my point's are conveyed. If not, then Idk how I'll be of help
Truth be told, I took your initial comment as a joke. So I was being sarcastic when I memed about what groomers usually say to their minors. I didn't expect we'd be so polar about this.
And I know the MC isn't thinking about romance as of now. But the ML, is blatantly on it. I'm not straying. That is what I meant
Maybe I'm just too grounded but this is lowkey glorified grooming with extra steps