me 4-5 years ago would’ve eaten ts up lmfaoo only like 5 chaps in n i cannot take this s...

lo ꪆৎ October 25, 2024 5:02 pm

me 4-5 years ago would’ve eaten ts up lmfaoo only like 5 chaps in n i cannot take this seriously the characters feel so unrealistic its js silly to me it doesn’t seem like this will get any better but is this worth continuing

Responses
    lo ꪆৎ October 28, 2024 2:38 am
    My point remains the same: "unrealistic" is a poor choice of words. I don't need to oppose or support your argument to sustain my views; my statement is as clear as I intended it to be. "Those seeking realism" ... Gravenshi

    Js so yk your last sentence reflects bias in your own argument

    Gravenshi October 28, 2024 4:10 am
    could you tell me why your viewpoint out of everyones is more reliable and valid? Someone who has continuously shown logical fallacies and contradictions in their arguments and even maybe uses ai to form their ... lo ꪆৎ

    I already did. Feel to reread if you are that curious.

    Besides, you don't need to antagonize me nor to rely on ad personam. My proses are not meant to be provocative. I keep replying out of politeness or because you keep projecting your misunderstanding on me. And yes, I know you are going to say for the 20th that I misunderstand like a broken record.

    What is the point of me saying that those seeking realism do not seek reality for one to conclude that unrealistic is an accurate term? Intricacies are sought, not realism. Intricacies do not equal reality, the more something is intricate does not mean it is closer to the real. It's a common misconception when modelling, believing the more complex the model is, the more it would grasp real patterns.

    In modeling and in storytelling, the level of complexity does not guarantees realism; complex models, just like complex characters, don’t inherently mirror reality. As such, reality or realism (commitment to reality) is not the goal, but sophistication, polishment, refinement and truly, plausibility. A lot of things are believable, everything believable is not real. A lot of things are complex, everything complex is not real. A lot of things are nuanced, everything nuanced is not real.

    As I already wrote, realistic characters are novelty, while exaggerated or unrealistic ones are the norm. Saying characters from a fiction are unrealistic is like complaining that artificial vanilla tastes like fake vanilla; it would be a novelty if it tasted like real vanilla. I like to think about HxH. Incredibly complex and nuanced characters. Far from realistic, but definitely plausible, coherent, cohesive, deep and authentic. "Plausible" is worth opening the dictionary for.

    Finally, if you are that displeased with my rhetoric and find it pointless, you do not need to keep seeking me.