Based on legal definitions, both in the USA and Korea, the events described in this story do not constitute rape but rather sexual assault and violence. People’s judgments often stem from personal experiences and emotions, rather than an objective understanding of the law. Many of those labeling it as rape are simply detractors, while many others seem focused on the surface rather than truly grasping the context.
While you are correct, but consent is reversible.
In this case, Dan both gives and withdraws consent multiple times.
To further what you said.
His lack of enjoyment doesn’t make it rape, nor is it close to rape. People seem to overlook the fact that Dan was a virgin the first time and naturally afraid of sex.
During that encounter, he even stopped himself from becoming fully aroused. As a sexual assault survivor, his reactions are shaped by complex psychological factors, which many people don’t seem to fully understand. They use this for their opinion (of it is rape) as it supports them but it really doesn’t. It shows it is more complex than their opinion. There are some that thinks attempted rape is rape but it is just sexual assault not rape.
does this have rape :)?