ahhhh

Moth September 23, 2024 10:06 am

I was originally hesitant given the nature of colonization and stuff like that, but the author but so much love and care into portraying the indiginous group in the story that I actually grew to really like it (⌒▽⌒)

Responses
    ReviewRaptor September 25, 2024 4:21 am

    Colonization has literally NOTHING to do with any part of the story. Not in the slightest.

    Colonizing means to go somewhere and take over the place, settling there, making it yours/stealing it from the inhabitants. This story only shows a rich old researcher going to random places, like vacations basically, and happens to have come across an untouched tribe that's in need of help and gladly accepts said help.

    This is so far removed from colonization that I'm worried about what your meaning of this severe term is in your mind. ( ̄∇ ̄")

    Moth September 25, 2024 6:15 am
    Colonization has literally NOTHING to do with any part of the story. Not in the slightest.Colonizing means to go somewhere and take over the place, settling there, making it yours/stealing it from the inhabitan... ReviewRaptor

    Okay so since you clearly didn’t actually understand what I meant. first off, last I checked rich people going to “untouched” tribes (lands inhabited by the native people) was one of the reasons most indigenous people and cultures got nearly wiped out or WERE wiped out in the first place.

    Second off, I was scared this story would use rhetoric that the people needed to be “educated” and thus have their customs and culture erased for the sake of integrating them into Japanese society. It didn’t do that, which is why I mentioned being happy with the story for it choosing not to take that route and instead respecting the culture portrayed in the story and going in a more positive direction.

    ReviewRaptor September 25, 2024 11:10 am
    Okay so since you clearly didn’t actually understand what I meant. first off, last I checked rich people going to “untouched” tribes (lands inhabited by the native people) was one of the reasons most indi... Moth

    I see. Simply going someplace where tribes live isn't colonizing, colonizing is when you settle on the land and claim it as yours. And it sounded like you viewed simply going to places as colonizing, hence my comment and worries.
    I'm glad if it was just a misunderstanding due to how it's worded. I'm still bordering PTSD over here from the nonsense that happened in this comments section ages ago (people yelling racism, colonization and lots of other nonsense when it simply wasn't true at all). Sorry for worrying your post was going into that direction. (/TДT)/

    I think we can be happy not only about the erasing of culture not being done and whatnot, but also that the author kept things fictional. Because what ACTUALLY erased many tribes was the illnesses humans brought along rather than taking away their land and them fighting the intruders to the end. Even moreso nowadays than back then, since our immune systems are tougher due to generations of being used to it and getting vaccinated. That's why some/the last untouched tribe discovered cannot be interacted with. It would make them ill and they'd perrish. :')
    The author definitely did a great job portraying an actual tribe (but not too realistic, with the illness thing and all), with details and all, and settling for a story that went for them developing themselves rather than being pulled into modern society and vanishing. I really wish more people would write about these kinda things. It's a really lovely topic and leaves room for lots of creativity when creating a fictional tribe. Or even deities and such if you make it somewhat fanatsy.

    Loulou January 31, 2025 3:11 pm

    Since I can’t reply to the other persons I’m just going to reply to yours so I can hopefully educate some people but my whole comment is a reply to them not you love dw :) — “Beause what ACTUALLY erased many tribes was the illnesses humans brought along rather than taking away their land and them fighting the intruders to the end.” -…yeah and the only reason they inherited those illnesses was because of COLONISATION. I don’t think it’s right to try diminish how grotesque colonisation is and to try hide the fact that truly it was all the colonisers faults and try blame it on the illnesses they brought (I’m not denying obviously the illness they brought had an impact but not as big as your making it to be for all indigenous ppl around the world, maybe some but not all). Also you take is deeply flawed as it’s rooted in uh…well the obvious fact that not all indigenous people around the world who have been colonised lost their people because of the illnesses the colonisers brought. That’s called a generalisation. I can say with certainty that that isn’t the case here in Australia for our First Nations (native Australian/aboriginals), a lot of them aren’t with us today because of the colonisers actions, have you ever heard of the stolen generation? The genocide aboriginals here in Australia had to go through? You should look into it, if you have any means of actually educating yourself further. — Also indigenous Australians definitely had trouble will the illnesses the colonisers gave them and they still do to this day but the genocide they experienced was not mainly bc of the illness the colonisers brought them it was bc of the COLONISERS.