Yep. People need to understand this. They should've put a trigger warning on this chapter. Did they? I can't remember.
Like media has the power to influence people, so they should be careful with stuff like this. With this many people invalidating his non-con, gullible people would think marital SA or SA by partner isn't SA
Listen guys.
Whatever action that goes against your consent, is wrong.
Hi again you commented on a thread of mine. I wanted to apologize I thought about it and re read it your right although I believe he really didn't hear her. She still revoked consent many times while crying so I can see how she could also have felt scared & unsafe In that moment. Although when engaging in sexual intercourse sometimes we can get caught in the moment it is still our duty to check in on are partners. Not sure if you saw my previous response. Cause I did catch an attitude after you was like you have to explain and I was like wtf but I had to step back and take out my own personal experiences and views.So I deleted my previous thread since my views changed a bit. I didn't want to leave it up any longer. So thank you.
I also do agree with your statement of them being fine later this is something they will learn from and be better with in the future. Hopefully.
OK. Yall NEED to understand that in a real life scenario, THIS IS TECHNICALLY SA. Why? Because she clearly revoked consent by saying no many times, he "lost control" (which isnt a thing irl) and made her feel unsafe and even physically harmed. It is VALID for people to be disturbed by this.
It will end up okay because he WILL be punished by her for it by her, and likely wont do it again. They will be FINE.
But we need to understand that in REAL LIFE it is not normal or okay to "lose control" like that, and that it is GOOD for people calling it out.
If you are in the comments saying its "not rape" you genuinely need to research what rape and rape culture are.