HOLY FUCK GET HELP. not all rape is the same?????? and YOU CAN REVOKE CONSENT AT ANY TIME FOR ANY REASON. LEGALLY. stop being a fucking FREAK and invalidating OTHER VICTIMS.
its ONLY percieved differently IF there is a safe word??? stop making excuses for poor behavior.
you need to go to your fucking therapist and talk to them about this. it is a FACT that you can revoke consent at any time for any reason, which you said YOURSELF. delete your comments and threads and reflect on what horrible things youve said.
from google:
"Consent can be revoked at any time, as long as it's clearly communicated. This can be done verbally or non-verbally"
READ.
You just edited it. AND IN YOUR OWN SENTENCE,YOU SAID "it can be revoke anytime AS LONG AS IT'S CLEARLY COMMUNICATED", girl, COURTNEY ONLY SAID STOP AND RICHARD STOP A BIT LATE BECAUSE HE DID NOT HEAR RIGHT AWAY BUT HE STOP,IT WAS CLEAR. RICHARD DID NOT USED FORCE TO CONTINUE AND COURTNEY DID NOT SAID STOP I DON'T WANT TO CONTINUE THIS. DID SHE SAID THAT?Girl,you want to proved your idiocy and how shallow you are.
SO,YOU SOUNDED IT LIKE R*PE VICTIMS SHOWED INTERESTS IN HAVING S*X WITH THEIR PERPETRATORS BUT WITHRAW IN THE MIDDLE BECAUSE THEY DON'T FEEL LIKE TO CONTINUE IT.?DOES THAT NOT SOUND SHALLOW TO YOU? YOU'RE INSULTING THE REAL LIFE VICTIMS BY INSISTING YOUR IDIOCY THAT THEY REVOKE THEIR CONSENTS THAT'S WHY THEY WERE R*PED?
GIRL, JUST IN MY COUNTRY,ONLY YESTERDAY THERE WAS A BROADCAST OF ANOTHER VICTIM WHO WAS KILLED BY BEING R*PED. SHE DIED BECAUSE SHE WAS STABBED MULTIPLE TIMES AND HER NECK WAS SLIT. THERE'S NO DAY IN A MONTH WHERE THERE IS NO BROADCAST ABOUT R*PE. THERE WERE A NURSING STUDENT,THE OTHER ONE WAS A CRIMINOLOGY STUDENT WHO WERE WAY OUT HOME BUT THE SUSPECTS WERE THERE ALREADY WAITING FOR THEM IN THE DARK. THE NURSING STUDENT WAS FOUND DEAD IN THE SHORE WHILE THE CRIMINOLOGY STUDENT WAS FOUND IN AN ABANDONED LOT IN A DECOMPOSITION STATE. Their families are shouting for justice. These women were robbed not just their lives but their dreams as well. And here you are, insisting that they revoked their consents? They did not even know that they were r*ped that day and you're saying that they revoked their consent as if they agreed in the first place?
Angelic was right. I don't know about this BDSM so I googled about it. So read it. Maybe author nim get some ideas from here. And here you are making it a big deal as if you were a real victim of assault. You cannot even give evidence to your baseless claims. Show your evidence first.
What Is Consensual Non-Consent?
Consensual non-consent is a discussion around consent to engage in a power or dominating sexual act between two or more people that will play out as though it is nonconsensual. It is a type of role-play between two people where they are enacting a scenario where non-consensual sex is happening, though the act is ultimately consensual. CNC kinks can be under the umbrella of BDSM play, however, ultimately, each individual who identifies as someone involved in the BDSM community has their palette of sexual acts they like to participate in. CNC kinks may or may not be a part of this palette.
CNC kinks may be considered controversial because of their inherently triggering nature. For someone who has experienced sexual trauma or rape, the idea of consenting to an act like this might feel extremely uncomfortable or triggering. CNC kinks are also controversial because they can lead to very painful and confusing experiences if not handled responsibly between two or more people involved. Most individuals in the BDSM community will prioritize safety and communication above all else due to respect for the potentially dangerous nature of the activities involved in BDSM if mishandled.
Common forms of CNC kinks include:
Rape fantasy:
Where one individual is role-playing raping another individual.
Kidnapping:
A scenario where one individual is role-playing, kidnapping another individual.
Blackmailing:
A scenario in which one individual is role-playing blackmailing another individual.
Interrogation: A scenario in which one individual is interrogating another.
Somnophilia: A scenario in which one person is sleeping while the other person performs a sexual act with them.
I HOPE IT WILL SINK IN YOUR SHALLOW MIND. NEXT TIME YOU READ A MANHWA LIKE THIS BE SURE THAT YOU'RE OPEN MINDED. IF YOU'RE NOT FEELING COMFORTABLE THEN GO FIND OTHER RATED 15 MANHWA. THE NEXT UPDATE IS NEAR,YOU SHOULD HAVE WAITED FOR IT BEFORE YOU JUDGED. YOU ONLY JUDGED IT ACCORDING TO THAT LAST PANEL. GO READ IT FROM THE START. YOU'RE THE ONE WHO SAID THAT IT SHOULD BE CLEARLY COMMUNICATED.
This is my last reply to you @kittykat. If you reply to this just make sure to show your evidence,not just your self edited and made sentence. And,make sure to read my comment word by word. If your next reply is just as shallow as your previous then I won't buy it anymore. You're preaching @Angelic bout having bad behavior while it was you who are toxic and rude. Just because she and me are not agreeing with you,and are not in your circle?
This manhwa was made for those open minded and comfortable to read it. Richard did not used force and threat to Courtney to call it rape. He did not make love to Courtney against her will. AND BESIDES,YOU ARE NOT SURE IF COURTNEY IS REVOKING HER CONSENT JUST BECAUSE OF THAT "STOP". It wasn't clear yet,and here you are making the biggest deal out of it. WAIT FOR THE NEXT CHAPTER BEFORE YOU JUDGE IT. I'm still waiting for your NOT edited and self made evidence, just so you know.
... saying no and stop are clear communicators. he did NOT stop right away, it took him awhile, that is assault. what the fuck is your issue??? this is the TRUTH. why are you so fucking offended?? go back to your therapist.
also this WAS NOT CNC?????????????? oh my god????? what is wrong with you??? why do you think identifying this as a violation invalidates you???? this has NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU.
IT WAS A QUOTE FROM GOOGLE. google "revoke consent" its that easy?
why is it so hard for you to understand you are wrong? why are you having a literal public meltdown about it? its literally going to be shown in the next chapter that he FUCKED UP.
saying "stop" and "no" is revoking consent. she wanted him to stop. he didn't. many people have been raped this way. it IS violating and scary.
its also unbelievable that youre trying to call it CNC, that is vile.
TALK TO YOUR THERAPIST.
there are many rape victims who consented initially. this is NOT uncommon????? can you please actually learn and grow from this? why are you throwing a tantrum over correct information. this isnt about kink. this is about a man ignoring how a woman revoked consent.
btw this person is having an insane temper tantrum bc they think saying someone was raped after revoking consent is somehow offensive to them.
TAKE A MINUTE and actually absorb what ive said to you. he left her crying and feeling violated... because he ignored her revoking consent to that action, and they did not make a safe word. that is rape by definition. saying no and stop like that, that SEVERELY, is revoking consent, and every source online verifies this.
literally just read up on what revoking consent is. there is absolutely NO reason that you should be having a full on meltdown in a comments thread because you were corrected on something youre not educated about. read about the experiences of other real life people who have experienced this. many people were disturbed by this scene for a reason, because it IS disturbing.
calling this assault, which it is bc she revoked consent by saying no and stop, in no way invalidates you. YOU are the one invalidating other victims for no reason over a WEBTOON. you are clearly in need of a mental health professional and im NOT saying that as an insult.
how does this scene being rape invalidate anything you went through? not all rape scenarios are the same.
@ kittykat,it was clear who among us here is toxic and needs therapy. Insisting that the real life victims of r*pe are because they revoke their consents. Clearly it was insulting because you want to say that they gave their approval to be sexually harassed,violated and assaulted. I already told you that revocation of consent is only applicable if the victim is significantly younger or too young to understand what she is consenting to.
For example,there was a girl named J.L. who went on a date with BABY by the seaside. J.l and Baby got caught in the moment and they started to kissed and touched until they went too far. But suddenly,J.L said STOP,I DON'T WANT TO CONTINUE,Baby got irritated and forcefully insist his sexual desire to J.L. The Law finds BABY guilty because BABY INSIST HIS DESIRE BY FORCEFULLY CONTINUING TO J.L. HE DID NOT STOP UNTIL HE WAS SATISFIED.That is the clear definition of the word revoking of consent. I know because I already Google it. It happened in MARYLAND USA. Besides, BABY was way too older than the minor J.L.
Now,back in the manhwa. It wasn't clear yet,what Courtney means of that word stop. But Richard did not force his desire and he stop already. You only based your judgement according to the last panel of the manhwa. I even doubt if you read the whole chapter,you only want to find fault and rant. In this chapter,it was Richard who told Courtney that they should STOP first. He wanted to penetrate Courtney but it was her who told him that he should bear with it. I don't know if you intentionally denied or ignored that fact. Just to WEAPONISED your gender/sex you ignored the opposite's side of the story. Don't based your judgement purely on words,show evidence with actions too. Words are not acceptable in court without prior evidence.
You only said "no is no" but that is purely words,where is your evidence? Is there a rapist who showed guilt all over his face? Richard will be punished by Courtney not for Violating her but because of disobeying her previous rules. Next time,do some research first before you open your big mouth.
@ kittykat,I guessed you did not hear some of your comments out of anger lol. You said,and I quote: "this has nothing to do with you". Well,this has nothing to do with the both of us. We are both readers but me has no big deal about this matter while you acted as if you're the most affected victim of all. And,I am not sharing my experience to mislead others, I'm sharing it for them to learn from it. Unlike you who gives wrong and/or edited version of the information.
Why are you so hot tempered? Just because I nailed it. I give you lots of evidence from reliable sites. I guessed you did not read the whole thing. Are you embarrassed to accept that you're not right. You jump into conclusions without reading the whole thing. It's okay if you want to further embarrass yourself. Play like a genius.
"No" without clear communication and without force from the accused is not r*pe. Actions speak louder than words,girl. Remember that.
There's no rape, both give their consent it's just that this is also their first time. Courtney was the one who displayed her meat and give Richard the order to eat it. Richard driven by the pleasure to eat meat for the first time in his life got excited but he never forced Courtney. It's just that they don't know how to please each mate before the consummation. Both got excited even Courtney herself. Both of them has no experience at all,both are ignorant about this kind of pleasurable exercise. BESIDES,RICHARD WANTED TO PENETRATE COURTNEY FIRST. HE WAS HESITANT TO PUT HIS GIANT COCK INSIDE COURTNEY,HE EVEN SAID TO WAIT FOR A MOMENT BUT COURTNEY WAS THE ONE WHO SAID TO BEAR WITH IT.