I understand your anger and the hurt that comes from being both groomed and assaulted—it’s beyond unfair to have to endure that kind of trauma. It's valid to feel upset about how people sometimes romanticize or trivialize these experiences but that is not happening here.
However, I’d encourage you to be careful about becoming consumed by that anger. Sometimes, the things we hate can shape us in ways we don’t expect. It’s important to channel your emotions in ways that allow you to heal, rather than become the very thing you're fighting against.
You are becoming what you hate. You are talking about yourself.
Lying about my friend and dismissing their perspective isn’t constructive. They’re discussing the complexities of coercion and consent, which are important themes in the story. It’s unfair to label them as silly; that feels more like self-projection. They’ve acknowledged sexual assault multiple times and clarified that while you believe there’s rape, the story and legal definitions don’t support that.
If you read their posts, you’d see they’ve consistently pointed out that sexual coercion is a form of sexual assault and that both are present in Jinx. What you did was a strawman argument. Rape is indeed worse, but not all sexual coercion is illegal—it’s still a serious issue.
Let’s focus on the actual content of the discussion instead of trying to discredit each other.
They’ve made their points clear in the thread you responded to, emphasizing the distinction between sexual coercion and rape. It's essential to engage respectfully and factually in these discussions.
https://www.mangago.zone/home/mangatopic/17076355/?page=2
They said here. twice. One was about 12 hours ago.
"It's important to remain factual and use accurate terminology in discussions like this. Let's ensure we're engaging in a respectful manner. Sexual coercion is a type of sexual assault, and the examples provided on this site clearly distinguish between sexual assault and rape. Only one of the examples is classified as rape.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/sexual-coercion#is-it-abuse
“Sexual coercion is when a person pressures, tricks, threatens, or manipulates someone into sex. It is a type of sexual assault because even if someone says yes, they are not giving their consent freely.”
Sexual coercion is sexual assault.
-----
They have posted a few times. It is from a friend of ours. this has been posted a few times over the months. It is clear they are saying Jinx has sexual coercion which is SA, not rape. So why use a strawman and change what they said?
My friend pointed out that your comments are becoming toxic, which can lead to harmful attitudes. They emphasized the importance of separating fiction from reality. Jinx doesn’t romanticize rape, and calling it a 'romanticized version of abuse' is a subjective. The relationship between Jaekyung and Dan is not portrayed as romantic. While you have not read this Dan left and the fake relationship is over.
Also, it’s worth noting that many people enjoy fantasy content without condoning real-life abuse. Sexual fantasies are a normal part of human sexuality, and they don’t equate to endorsing harm in reality. It’s important to recognize this distinction rather than projecting hatred onto others. Let’s focus on having a respectful discussion about the actual content of the story.
Hey, I watched this video about jinx, and I think it explains the book well, https://youtu.be/VUj7l68y7eM?si=IvfXXJJLNF7ws8XZ
Obviously you dont have to watch it, but if you do, I hope you realize why you shouldn’t be defending this book
We've read the book many times. Is my friend defending the book? That is a strawman argument.
However, anyone can defend any story. I hope you realize that you shouldn't be changing someone's words to make that statement or spreading misinformation.
We know that video is from a hater and misleading everyone; this story does not contain rape. We're part of the audience that the creator ignored - the middle.
It’s a biased video—my friend thinks it’s trash https://www.mangago.zone/home/mangatopic/17068741/?page=2
That person tagged this comment. I don’t think acknowledging valid criticisms or explaining the story is the same as defending the book. Cautioning someone against letting their anger consume them isn’t defending the book either. You seem to be defending readers, but remember, people are not books. Using misinformation from a hater to discredit someone is unfair, unproductive, and overused on this page
Womp womp? They deleted that profile—that’s makes that more suspicious. It’s ironic to call it 'being nice' while using gaslighting and strawman arguments. Spreading misinformation from a hater and presenting it as fact isn’t helpful.
Let’s focus on a genuine discussion instead of dismissing valid concerns.
the fact you read a book about romanticizing SA and r8pe is concerning but you read it numerous times? even worse. you admitted you know it's sa yet you ignore it and attempt to change the topic to "being disrespectful". you could say its biased if there's only one or two videos bashing the manhwa, except numerous videos are addressing how this manhwa romanticizes r8pe and if anything you and you're friend are trash
yeah, sexual fantasies of being sexually assaulted and sexual coercion. you're acting as if it's not a big deal this stuff actually happens to people it's not fiction and yet you say they don't equate to endorsing harm in reality? and when you say I shouldn't project hatred onto others it's ignorant, how do you think I feel having been sa'ed yet people romanticize it saying 'wow I wish I was dan" if you wanna talk about respect then stop being disrespectful yourself and be mindful of real sa victims
Let me guess you read this nasty shit too... the audacity you have to even reply again after telling me to stfu because since I'm 'not' a victim of sa I shouldn't have a say. Keep in mind that I AM otherwise why would I be triggered? Now I'll ask you the same, who are you to argue with a sa victim because you yourself fantasize about it?
people watering down r*pe is so sick in the head like its so obnoxious towards sa victims honestly screw you if you read this