i don't get it

Thanks for proving my point.

If anyone is being inhumane, it seems to be reflected in your approach. It's clear you're deflecting and projecting your own feelings. Perhaps you should reflect on your own responses, as it appears you're the one feeling insulted.

ive come to find most of your comments are ai generated, which is why you can reply in a fast succession. not sure what ur deal is as ive seen multiple of ur comments stating that "jaekyung is an angel" which is a personal bias and opinion and your alleged stalker just copies the same things you say.

perhaps your right, its insulting as a sa victim to see everyone water down the severe themes in jinx, but what you said is hypocritical as op is also stating their opinions so im inclined to share mine.

No. I am writing the messages. Since you said that, that is a red flag.

I have never said Jaekyung was an angel. That is the cyberstalker saying weird things as the copied me to make me look bad but it reflects poorly on them.

And my cyberstalker does copy what I said sometimes but they have not today (yet). So look at the profile before making more false accusations.

I am a survivor of sexual assault, and it’s frustrating to see people exaggerate and distort what happens in jinx. Some are overly critical of the story, even claiming Jaekyung beat Dan, which never happened as the loan sharks did that. Nothing I’ve said is hypocritical, and it’s concerning that you're resorting to personal attacks rather than focusing on the actual story. Sharing opinions and facts about a story is one thing, but personal attacks are not opinions—they're harmful.

my ai checker on my computer flagged like half of you comments as ai whether it you or your twin i have no idea, when i click on ur supposed stalkers account it takes me to yours

i will start this message by saying this is my opinion so dont mince my words, i dont know how you deal with anything as a survivor and everyone copes differently but if you genuinely believe jinx has no sexual violence then i strongly suggest you seek out professional help and i say that with no malicious intent

you keep responding with shallow takes on what im saying so if youd like further proof LABY made a video on youtube explaining the topic at hand and they explained it in a much easier fashion with proof. not "opinionated"

I read the first comment again after a comment against it.
The OP expressed their confusion and shared their experience with reading similar stories. They're accurate in saying Jaekyung is like a green flag compared to other toxic characters. This is a more watered-down story compared to others in the same genre.

While the definition of rape can be more nuanced, especially with issues like consent and the removal of a condom without consent. I am saying there are forms of rape that don’t fit the OP’s definition.

Dan agrees to the arrangement multiple times throughout the story. Jaekyung does pay Dan for sex, which is referenced often, and Dan agrees and allows it—this is consistent with the story's events.

The transactional nature of their relationship could be considered prostitution, which may be illegal, (it is illegal where I live), but Jaekyung consistently gives Dan choices, telling him twice in their first encounter that he could leave. Dan, being 29, chose to stay because he agreed and needed the money (and personal interests can be added). The claim that Jaekyung isn’t decent is valid, and they are right with calling him more toxic than how he is portrayed in the stories doesn’t hold up to claims. The OP is correct that some are exaggerating his actions or making claims that aren’t true.

I don’t see how OP’s comment is opinionated or ignorant when it’s based on facts from the story and other stories.

Ai isn’t writing my responses.

AI-generated text refers to completely automated responses where the AI creates content from scratch, without user input or specific direction.
That isn’t happening.
There are two profiles here that looks like mine. I don’t know if they are using ai responses. I try not to read their comments.

In my comment to Seungo’s hoe, which is my third comment

“What I was going to say with how I first interpreted it: What is happening is a form of prostitution and there is some coercion (manipulation) involved but it depends on the country and jurisdiction.
And now with what you are asking ………
My answer to this:
(Again I think it is off from your question.)
Dan doesn’t know it but chapter 34.

Bringing in a third party without the Dan’s knowledge or consent would violate his rights and privacy. This could also fall under voyeurism, sexual exploitation, or other criminal offenses, depending on the laws in the specific region.
it would likely be considered illegal and deeply unethical due to the violation of consent.”


Just because I say there is no rape in Jinx doesn’t mean I don’t acknowledge the presence of sexual violence. There is a valid interpretation that others may see it differently in a fictional story. However, claiming people who see no sexual violence in the story need professional help is an attempt to discredit them, which isn’t fair or constructive.

Shallow takes? That is you judging you, right?

About Laby’s video.

I am not watching trash. She is a hater and that thing is biased. She thinks it is rape. Someone else said she said thinks it is Stockholm Syndrome on here. It can’t and won’t be Stockholm Syndrome.

"one day youll realize the severity of all of this" this made me laugh XDDDD THIS is what's gonna happen to u when you'll grow up a little more soon my kid

This is genuinely a weird way to think I am not even joking it’s one thing to rationalize toxic traits but to actually try to excuse rape as a mere plot or flaw is disturbing and baffling.you can like this fictional character but do not create a new definition for rape anything done without your consent whether you said yes other times or not whether you are in a relationship or not is rape.please keep that in mind.

No one is excusing rape. There is no rape depicted in the story.

It's concerning to see such a fixation on labeling the story as rape without engaging with its actual content. Refusing to consider the details or alternative perspectives indicates a lack of willingness to have a constructive discussion. The story’s content and legal definitions do not support the claim of rape. It’s important to respect the narrative and recognize that differing viewpoints should be based on facts rather than personal bias. If you choose not to engage with the specifics, it limits the potential for meaningful dialogue.

What's going on in your heads? what you guys don't understand is NONE IS EXCUSING RAPE. Why are you talking about "rationalizing" when you're reading a fictional story to precisely evade reality?

Is it not excusing rape when you say a character already signed a contract therefore it does not matter whether he says stop because he signed up for this ? is that not making up excuses?.i know this is fiction but as I said excusing toxic traits or complex behaviors from characters is normal nor is it weird but once you start excusing rape as mere flaw for a character!!!.you can like this manhua but don’t act as if there were not multiple times where he said stop or wait or that he did not want to do this.

Yes I'm excusing toxic behaviors precisely because it's a fiction what's the problem? As you want if it's rape then it is, I'm not gonna talk about that, but what are u gonna do about it exactly? Call 911?

Thank you for proving my point that anybody who genuinely enjoys this has no reading comprehension I almost had a stroke trying to understand what you replied with but nonetheless thank you

Bruuuh I see u did understand my point at all, was my reply a nonetheless or just are u brainless, I wonder