data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/632fd/632fd97b620d8eb2c40133ada6751c6dada9d5c9" alt=""
You need to experience more not just life as well as studies and comprehensive in this area igs to understand that ‘masterpiece’ aren’t just applicable to limited meanings./ aren’t limited.
If op says it’s masterpiece then, They read it in a way that is not just the facade but more. In short in ‘details’
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebd23/ebd2324127b957e8815d00fe17a36bd18dcd4d60" alt=""
Who do u think you are lmaooo, I'm so much older than u (I can tell by ur stupidity) and you've got the gall to pretend you know more about life than I do? Give me a break, you're so pathetic. You don't explain anything to me on top of that, which isn't surprising given that u don't have any arguments bc justifying is so shamefuuul.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebd23/ebd2324127b957e8815d00fe17a36bd18dcd4d60" alt=""
"A masterpiece is an accomplished work of its kind. This term is usually used in the arts, to emphasise the perfection of the work, resulting from the mastery of the craftsman or artist and often coupled with a remarkable imagination". So basically I just take a simple definition in internet and you can just see the fact that the story is absolutely not a masterpiece (even if you tried to tell me that masterpiece aren't mean that way). It's not at all something that could be described as an 'accomplished work', because it simply romanticizes a relationship that has no place, at least not in the way it was undertaken. To cut a long story short, it just doesn't make any sense, it's just made for sm*t, it's got neither head nor tail. But I can't deny that the author had a remarkable imagination for realising something so shameful, even if it's fiction ;)
I hope, children, that one day u will understand that is not normal.
… it’s a fucking masterpiece