Reread this again

I don't think so :( Let me just remind... that at the start he didn't let Dan prepare himself (mentally) until he asked him to. And he didn't care about his health too (remembering him doing Dan with bruises)

Yea he was bad at the start no doubt but him always yelling at Dan in the recent chapters has been getting on my nerves

Oh no yeah like we were already off to. Calling it a bad start feels trivializing tbh. And it only went downhill from there. I’m ngl though I wonder if Jaekyung actually got worse or if his behavior feels increasingly more reprehensible given how much Dan (confusingly, nonsensically) grows to care more and more for not only physically but also mentally and emotionally. Like the chapter(s) when Dan goes out of his way to work additional jobs to make enough money to buy a gift that he thinks would be suitable enough for Jaekyung and Jaekyung responds the way he does just fucking twists my heart so bad. Jaekyung deserves nothing good in life and I hope he loses everything that he has

Thanks for addressing a few areas of character development. From the potential redemption to the regression. Character development doesn’t always have to be positive. This moral decline or complexity is caused by facing internal conflicts that caused a negative development before allowing further evolution.

A cyberstalker under the guise of "Mornind Diamonds" is indeed a cyberstalker and pedophile who has been involved in harassment and grooming. Their attempt to frame others and misrepresent the facts only highlights their ongoing efforts to deflect from their own misconduct.
If Morning diamond is truly honest, they should come forward with their alr accounts rather than hiding behind stolen identities and false claims about their targets.
This tactic is just another example of their attempts to avoid responsibility and mislead others. The focus should remain on addressing the harassment and ensuring that accurate information is shared.
The Cyberstalkers mock, harm, and misrepresent targets, making constructive dialogue difficult. They spread falsehood that only fits them as they are deflecting.

It’s important to recognize that the ongoing cyberstalking is a reflection of the stalker’s own insecurities and personal issues rather than any genuine conflict with the targets who is the whole of this comment section. The cyberstalker’s actions seem to stem from a grudge or a reaction to being proven wrong and called out for their behavior. Their attempts to impersonate targets and disrupt conversations highlight their own discomfort and insecurity.
Rather than focusing on the targets, the cyberstalker should address their own issues and let go of their vendetta. Their behavior only exposes their own self-doubt and internal struggles. It’s clear that their actions are more about their personal dissatisfaction than any real issues with the individuals they are targeting.

Let’s continue to focus on maintaining a respectful and constructive dialogue. We should avoid engaging with individuals who are clearly acting out of personal animus and remain committed to positive interactions.