Clarification on Recent Identity Issues and Behavior
To all concerned,
It has come to our attention that there have been issues with identity theft and misleading behavior. The original "Morning Diamonds" has clearly stated that they no longer wish to be associated with these discussions and will not return to the conversation. They said they are not Morning Diamonds and the cyberstalkers can have the name. This separation reflects their decision to disengage from a situation marked by toxicity and deceit.
Cyberstalkers:
Attempting to mimic their identity or play the victim only highlights the cyberstalkers' behaviors and the issues at hand. It's important to acknowledge that their actions—whether initiating attacks or engaging in deceitful practices—are the root of the problem. Stealing identities and pretending to be someone else is not only immature but also reveals more about your character than about those you claim to represent.
On this topic:
We chose to step back from this situation until there is a genuine effort to demonstrate good faith and engage respectfully. Our departure from the conversation is a commitment to avoid contributing to mockery and deceit, and to maintain our own integrity. It is deceitful in what has occurred afterward.
"Silence is the best answer to someone who doesn't value your words."
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Imagine still showing you face in this thread but unable to disprove clear panels of dan getting raped by Jaekyung, you gotta be selective when you decide to be ignorant
https://www.mangago.zone/home/mangatopic/15972041/
" Any claims suggesting that we exited or avoided discussions about panels where Dan is depicted as being raped are unfounded. We do not engage with all posts by cyberstalkers and, if such panels exist, they are likely based on misunderstandings, misrepresentations, or outright fakes. I don't know what they are talking about. It is noted they are making all the targets one person again."
I promise you this person just check my account and see how many names the ChatGPT like person you’ve been interacting with has gone by
Let's see
Cyberstalker from February 10 has come in with lies.
In this situation, there are cyberstalkers and their targets. One of the cyberstalkers is trying to blur the lines between us and them, pretending that the targets are actually them. While they may claim to have schizophrenia, it’s important to emphasize that the targets are not them, and we are not them. Their goal is to harm the targets by pretending to be one of us.
it is concerning that someone would attempt to weaponize mental health issues like schizophrenia as part of their harassment tactics.
It’s unfortunate that they feel the need to resort to false accusations and mockery in an attempt to provoke a reaction. Posting factual replies and standing up against harassment is not 'crying'—it's about maintaining integrity and not allowing lies to go unchallenged.
These baseless claims have already been debunked, and continuing to spread them only further discredits their position. We see through these tactics, and they won't deter us from speaking the truth.
It's clear who's truly bothered here, and it's not the targets. Despite their attempts to disrupt, the truth will continue to stand.
You did not edit out a few lines. hehe.
Lmao can you make it more obvious that you're the same person? Even if you didn't have the same usernames/talk the same/at the same times, it would be harder pretend otherwise
Oh and also, you replied with both your alts yet still refuse to accept the panels where Dan is getting raped by jaekyung, keep ignoring it like you have been for over 50 times right in this topic that's available to look back on
He’s talking to himself again i’m fucking crying
one of many "I hope we can engage in a respectful manner, acknowledging different perspectives and maintaining precision in our discussions. Understanding and empathy are crucial in these conversations."
Look at how Akaito responded.
my friend addressed Akaito's behavior after our position was made.
"going to keep pressing them"
When I said "my friend addressed Akaito's behavior after our position was made." that comment was made August 2, 2024 10:52 pm We already decided to stop engaging with Akaito as we are not talking to Akaito.
I think this comment is the first time Akaito posted his notes. It was after many chances to have a constructive dialogue. August 2, 2024 11:31 pm
Akaito chose his path.
This is why my friend will not talk to Akaito.
"Your crime was talking about rape and sexual assault in an insensitive manner. Your crime was not being upfront with me. Your crime was not taking this conversation or any others you've been having with anyone else thus far seriously enough to engage with your own words and thoughts."
My friend was not being insensitive and they are an sexual assualt survivor. They are serious about this matter. They are serious about engaging with people. Akaito does not know the full picture.
but dan agreed even if it was his financial situation.
jaekyung is not obligated to help dan and run charity with money he worked hard to make.
i agree with you and what you said is what I'm trying to say... jaekyung has the right to decide what he will do with his money... and dan was presented the terms clearly that dan has to do it whenever wherever and however jaekyung likes to
have you ever been in a dire financial situation? His choices were a: be homeless, consistently harassed by loan sharks and die on the streets, or b: some harmless sex! Did Jk SPECIFY he would be forceful and ignore Dan's condition? Did he SPECIFY he'd do it in public? Did he SPECIFY that Dan had basically trapped himself in a slave contract? Dan is naïve. He would've been expecting occasional maybe weekly sex INSIDE of a building and for Jk to be gentle if he was in pain. We know that. What's more concerning is you see his mental state deteriorate. VERY rapidly. The consistent blaming himself is clearly him falling into depression/anxiety. I've experienced it first hand. It's not normal. But the authors trying to paint this pretty picture that Dan is ok. If you're stuck between a brick wall with a door that leads to a painful horrible death, and another brick wall with a door, this one leads to slavery but the slavery is just sex, you're BOUND to pick the slavery door. There's not much of a choice there. If Dan's first door wasn't such a dire situation, if it was just move into a smaller apartment and budget, would he have made the same choice? This is an instance of illusion of choice. If you put the character in the same situation but less severe, would they make the same choice? If the answer is no, then there was never a choice. There was the illusion of choice.
Nothing to add for now, the time, space, and energy I would need to detail all of my thoughts on all this exceeds every limit presented to me here. I need to see the story to completion before I make any final judgements. It did some things that I thought were genuinely interesting and praiseworthy at first and then began to fumble the bag with stupid plot devices and, well, mishandling the things it’d been doing well at first.
Look. If you’re into rape/non-con that’s fine. If you’re into the toxic shit that’s fine, so long as you understand that that is, in fact, what you’re reading. I’ll self-disclose and say I, too, enjoy those things (in a purely fictional context). But the fact that I am seeing several people in these comments trying to argue that what Jaekyung is/has been doing throughout this Webtoon WASN’T rape is deeply, deeply concerning to me. Usually I would blame the author for framing things in such a way as to make things ambiguous for reasons that have little to do with the story. But it is not the case here. Jaekyang is a wealthy man with status and power, physical and otherwise. He used those qualities from the get go and all throughout the Webtoon in order to get Dan, someone in a ridiculously desperate financial situation and with no leverage of his own to have sex with him. That is the gross abuse of power being used to coerce someone otherwise completely unwilling to have sex with you—that is rape. And it is a real and horrific thing that happens ALL the time in reality.
So don’t come at me with “technicalities” about this shit just because it’s fiction or whatever the fuck, because some of y’all aren’t talking about this as if it is, some of y’all aren’t applying nuance to this for the sake of having a worthwhile conversation. It’s genuinely scary to me that some of you seem to be unaware of the precise nature of what is going on here. Not that you’re reading the Webtoon, but that you don’t seem to be understanding it. It’s emblematic of many cultures’ poor sex ed and poor attitudes towards sex and consent. Because I don’t think anyone who has been educated enough should be able to walk away from this being unable to distinguish between rape and actual, consensual sex, especially when it is as clear-cut as it is here. I DO have to worry about how you guys would react to hearing someone in your real life in this kind of situation, or, and I hope it is never, ever the case, YOU being in this situation. Would you excuse it? Because you “agreed” to it? Would you relentlessly blame yourself like Dan does? Would you really be able to articulate your experience to get the help you need? Would you be able to respond well to someone else in this situation?