From what I understand, it really depends upon the country, the era, the class, and the religious views.
Considering we just saw a revolver, I imagine this is something like Europe in the 1800s. Also, she lived a sheltered life because she was ill.
There is a possibility that mothers teach their daughters, which is pretty universal. In a higher class, you might have a tutor briefly go over what is expected.
That said, if they were teaching a more pious, Abrahamic method, they would teach a woman to basically be a dead fish. There would be little if any foreplay. It would likely be extremely uncomfortable.
What was ultimately expected was for a wife to do whatever the husband told her to you. The church expected no foreplay and missionary position, with the intense solely for reproduction. Not for pleasure.
I would say that this particular universe is a little more enlightened.
Also, a man's education on sex was usually only limited to whatever his father told him or his friends. It was very common for a man before marriage to already have sexual experience, usually with "loose" women.
What he was expected to do with his wife his entirely different. Again, what was expected was the wife to be dead fish.
This is something that carried on into the latter part of the 20th century. There are even war posters literally telling wives to open up their legs to their husbands at beck and call in order to increase the population. Or more specifically, breed more soldiers. #-.-)
Well i know this is just a story and i love it really but just thinking like this really is like past.... Like woman knew absolutely nothing about sexual education and if they knew they were considered impurities or night women while man should know about EVERYTHING or they were considered impotent or something