So the comparison your trying to make is that it's ok since their adults but that ONLY counts if these adults met at that older age. Which completely invalidates the point being made. He met her and babysat her as a KID making there whole relationship super uncomfortable and within the bounds of grooming. As everyone knows first impression means everything it defines how is person is seen in another ones eyes. So, as far as I could tell, your going to defend this not seeing that Daigo also purposely sees her as a kid (a few scenes where he insinuates that) before there relationship was official?
Dude, could you not mix up apples and oranges.
I was going to agree with you until you postulated that it only counts if they met as adults.
No.
It's legal because two adults got together.
Your ICK is that you're associating their history with acts of grooming SIMPLY BECAUSE of the age gap. That's all your argument is. However, there have been NO indication that Daigo had a thing for toddler Chiaki. He had healthy relations with people either around his age or of legal standing.
Your ICK is the age gap and you're throwing gross allegations because of it.
It’s not a crime, they’re two grown adults who actually had not seen each other for many years as she moved away. He doesn’t have a wife, it’s an exwife. It’s fine if you don’t like the relationship, however age gap relationship does not automatically mean pedo. You need to get your definitions right because it’s neither pedo or grooming. Grooming would have to start as a child and with that intent, which neither happened.
wait yall how old r they?