Ouais, peut-être qu'on devrait débattre avec ma langue alors pour voir si vous arrivez à ne serait-ce que tenir la cadence de cette conv. Je parle anglais parce que c'est la seule langue que vous parlez, et vous n'hésitez pas une seconde à vous rabattre sur le non-natif, c'est à mourir de rire looool je me demande ce que ça donnerait un 3v1 et français votre 4ème langue :) Ah sinon si, si, c'est du spam, ma grosse,
If the translator is right.
They claimed you were fighting when they were the ones fighting. They clean you created pointless debates and just disappeared. We never created debates and what we have been in has never been pointless. They are just deflecting again.
Where has Shiki debated anything from after you defended them? How is you defended them or safety helping them and stopping the fighting, starting drama or causing a fight ? That seems like that hate group narrative.
Shiki is attacking everyone even the ones who defended them. Spam is not a glitch or trying to post a message that will not send due to a glitch. Calling that spam is weird but it is weird Shiki is claiming minors are annoying you? That is that hate group narrative and a strawman argument.
That is a catfish or sockpuppet account. Since we know three of them from the hate groups has spoke French here and with maybe up to 5 can speak French. It is easy to narrow down who that person may be.
If the translator is right, Shiki is claiming his defender is starting fights, causing drama and then leaving. That is deflection. Safety came in to stop the fight which Shiki tried to fight them over their misuse on the word spam. Then they started to claim strawman arguments showing they knew who the targets are even though we changed are names.
It is brainless to attack the one who defend you and then saying they start a fight when they did not. Then making states shown they knew who we are with name changes when they are part of that hate group that is harassing us.
I was basically based my defense of Shiki from two comments. I was wrong. But reading those comments again “Ye why, I don't see any difference. Jiwon had no mercy at start, JK helped uke even if it was for his own benefits”
There is a difference between Jiwon and JK. JK is more abusive. Jiwon did have mercy at the start. It would be definitely different if Jiwon had no mercy at the beginning. That would make Jiwon worse than Jaekyung and JK helped Dan but some of it wasn’t for his own benefit. Some of it was for Dan. He didn’t have to do some of the things he did.
You were right on what they were doing.
I should have read carefully.
I defended someone who is now clearly attacking and gaslighting me.
I'm soooooooo interested in seeing how mingwa is going to convince readers that jaekying deserves to be forgiven and should be the end game for dan. Coz most same readers know this is wayyyy out of the hands of the author now and I wanna see what will make us agree that he deserves any redemption