hope now the haters are going to leave us alone 🙏🙏 praying for more shotacon Yuu in ...

Bro I have posted only two original comments, I’m not taking shit from you
You pulling up facts from your ass like I just caught you red handed

Oh and to ensure more, no one replied to the original comments. Bro that’s straight up pathetic

I said 'for all I know', delulu... Do you even know the difference between the sentence "for all I know" and "pulling up facts from ass"??? Unbelievable...

Alright, then you werent the one who deleted them, my bad my bad xD

Doesnt change the fact you cry about proshippers not giving you valid arguments and when I basically wrote you a small essay you never answered and then the thread got deleted.

Now THAT'S pathetic (besides not understanding the fuck people mean and spitting nonsense abt catching me red handed XD lmao hahah doing what? reading? XD
I mean, honey, you've been here for a few chapters now XD hahaha)

Sorry I don’t go “for all I know” especially in an argument where you just randomly stare an irrelevant point

Are you like 12?

Oh I’m sorry but if you go through any other comments you’ll see either I’m the last message, or the last message is so embarrassing i don’t need to answer.

I still haven’t got a valid answer?? Let’s see how low you drop trying to defend yourself abs your cute little pedo friends.

There is a limit to being blind, the least you could do us admit this is the trashiest soft launch shotaporn

Apparently YOU are judging by the way you are always grasping at anything to make it into an insult xD

When a thread is deleted here is deleted, there is no way of knowing who did it, who was the original poster, who participated, etc if you don't remember or don't have a screenshot.
So, "for all I know" is a completely acceptable thing to say.

When you argued and explained how you weren't the one who deleted it, I accepted it. I'm not the one acting like a kid ヾ(❀╹◡╹)ﾉ

That's my point, you're always so quick to answer, but never did answer my very valid argument that just bc you don't wanna consider it as valid doesn't mean it isn't, Twelvie XD

And I don't defend pedos in my argument. Pedos should rot somewhere run by bad men instead of jail. My argument is about how it is possible for the brain to separate fiction from reality.

But fine, I'll write it again... Let me be done cooking lunch.

You think ANYTHING against reading this is valid??? I mean delusional also has its limit. I’m a 100% sure you can’t go against me by saying “fiction doesn’t affect reality”

Go defend the comments out there, someone upright said to be they like seeing a kid getting it up their ass, aren’t the affected? Go on write it

You outright trying to put words pro-pedos in my mouths xD

I never said pedos don't exist, honey, and again I'm not here to defend them, keep the fuck up.

I didn’t get my explanation so I assume you have none and your bullshit just proves further. 0 defending skills hope you shat your lunch

You think I have nothing to do to stay here all day just to say here replying shit to people just like you do? XD

Dummie: Fiction influences reality, and the brain can't really separate the two. So, people who read shota manga are likely to be predators and pedophiles! ToT

Any1 with a brain: I understand your concern but the human brain is quite sophisticated when it comes to distinguishing fiction from reality. For ex., the prefrontal cortex is heavily involved in critical thinking and decision-making. It's what evaluates what’s real and what’s not. When we watch a movie or read a book, we’re constantly using this ability to understand that these are just FICTION, not REAL events.

Dummie: But if someone is constantly exposed to shota, doesn't that affect their behavior?! ToT

Any1 with a brain: It's important to note that numerous psychological studies have looked into this and found no direct causal link between consuming fictional content, like shota manga, and engaging in criminal behavior. Just because someone reads or watches something doesn't mean they'll act it out. People have been reading violent stories for centuries without turning into criminals.

Dummie: Aren't the motivations for consuming such content suspicious though?! ToT

Any1 with a brain: People consume all kinds of fiction for various reasons. Be it art, narrative, or even as a form of escapism. It doesn't mean they endorse or want to enact what happens in those stories. For ex., many people enjoy crime dramas without having any desire to commit crimes themselves. It's about understanding that fiction is separate from reality.

Dummie: But surely, some people could be influenced negatively by this content?! ToT

Any1 with a brain: It's true that media can have some influence, but the context in which it's consumed matters A LOT. As I said, there ARE pedos out there, there are the freaks, I'm not saying there arent, but they are MINORITY, the odd ones out. Most people are perfectly capable of enjoying a fictional story without it affecting their real-life behavior. Plus, our legal and psychological systems recognize that there's a huge difference between thoughts and actions. Of course it's still disgusting to enjoy thinking of smol Tsubaki in a sexual manner but, if the ones who do are only interested to only thinking of smol Tsubaki and have zero interest in real kids, I'll count my blessings! Still weird af, but legally it is not considered crime :/ Consuming fiction doesn’t meet any criteria for diagnosing someone with a disorder like pedophilia. Those diagnoses are based on behavior, not media consumption.

Dummie: So, you're saying it's all harmless?! ToT

Any1 with a brain: Not exactly :D It's about recognizing the difference between correlation and causation. Enjoying a controversial genre like shota manga doesn't make someone a predator. The vast majority of consumers can separate fiction from their real-life actions. We need to focus on actual behaviors and evidence, not assumptions based on media consumption.

Dummie: How can you be so sure?! ToT

Any1 with a brain: The research on this is extensive. My arguments aren't baseless like you want them to be. Studies on media effects, including those on violent video games and explicit content, show that while there might be short-term emotional responses, mainly grief and anger, there's no conclusive evidence of long-term behavioral changes leading to criminal acts. Plus, we should remember that freedom of expression protects the right to create & engage with all sorts of fiction. It's about personal choice & responsible consumption, not about making STUPID blanket judgments.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2782710/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0149763416300257
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3092984/

Great. Well tried but failed.

The entire argument is on ONE point that also it stands wrong.

Here’s why;

“Fiction doesn’t affect reality”, but that is STILL being studied. What you have done your “study” on are either from REALLY long time back or the top most searched sites. No, fiction cannot be separated from reality entirely. Studies have proved THAT too. If you consume too much of a particular fiction which is very VERY controversial you are BOUND to act on it. This is chapter 99…

Even if you read crime documentaries, 17% are most likely to not be affected in some sort of way. Either troubled or disturbed or the bad part, aroused. Worse case scenarios, if used as a “coping skill” they are most likely to act on it. Have you any idea the amount of crimes being committed, 60% still unsolved and have you any idea why?

You used “coping” as an excuse to read this bullshit? I’m not even going to it. 1. It’s going to ruin you more and 2. It’s an excuse. No in between. Sorry not sorry.

Regularly, people come across fantasy by reading comic books or movies and can easily differentiate them from their real life. People might say there is a noticeable wall between both terms. But in fact, the line between fiction and reality is so blurry that both terms submerge into each other at some points.

And this, this is not about “fiction doesn’t affect reality”. Have you seen what lines they have crossed? This is an abomination to the “shota genre” although they shouldn’t even exist in the first place. “Fiction” is being used to excuse the behaviour of the artist. So why are you having this argument with me? Have you finally opened your eyes?

Not only that, I’ve come across the same exact points at least 50 times. All you guys do is repeat the same points over and over again like a zombie. Man, you disappointed me.

And about the “short term affect” that one has after consuming any media, that time period is ENOUGH to commit a crime. No, there has NOT BEEN extensive or proper studies yet, video games are said to make the kid MORE aggressive, and bullying is used as an example, but you do know that the video games DO influence it.

Let’s break it down for you because you are stupid as fuck:

Don’t you want to sometimes put yourself in a fictional person? Cosplay them? Try to understand them? It ALL happens unconsciously.

Exactly. Unconsciously. And the negative works perfectly fine too.

Another one for you

CONTROVERSIAL GENRES DO NOT CONTAIN “WHOLESOME LOLI SOFT CORE PORN” OUTRIGHT, IT HAS TO HAVE A DEEP MEANING AND THE ***CONSEQUENCES***

CONTROVERSIAL GENRE CAN CONTAIN PEDOPHILIA INCEST MURDER RAPE

BUT NEVER JUSTIFIED OR LEFT “WHOLESOME”


Thank you,
Hope you understood

Oh also
You used “Loli” for dummies but crime for “people with brain”

Stupid comparison

Crime and loli are different fucking things

People who read crime are sane, they read crime documentaries for many reasons but not for “satisfaction”
And even if they read it for “satisfaction”, they are MORE justified because in the end, it shows the CONSEQUENCES and it shows how they got caught
And obviously we foster a HATRED for the criminal

I cant speak for everyone, but I read for that "mexican soap opera-like" drama plot, not the satisfaction you mean. ╮(￣▽￣)╭

Like when the MC finds out she was going out with her half-brother, or when one of them is a priest: I just wanna read how it all is gonna play out, is all.

As I said, no real kid is getting hurt here and > if there's a sicko getting satisfied with this & thus leaving REAL kids alone, then I say keep them chapters coming! <
I'll stay here reading my shit for the drama eating my popcorn ヾ(❀╹◡╹)ﾉ~

And you are wrong again. There are TONS and TONS of people who become avid fans of villains without commiting crimes themselves.
If ppl actually couldn't separate fiction from reality, ppl would never be able to drown Sims in the pool by taking out the stairs. Or, if they did, they would be crushed by overwhelming guilty, pobrably leading to mental issues if left without treatment.
Or people would never move on from long book sagas or animes. Can you imagine what Harry Potter would have done to peoples' emotions if we really did not have this ability of not being influenced by fiction??? It's like you WANT to stay blind!

Oh GOD, I've been wasting my time with a "video games make kids violent" stupid fuck all along????
Good fucking lord, can't believe it, if I knew, holy shit... (╯°Д °)╯╧╧

Had I known you were 80, I wouldnt have bothered -- gooobye, lady -- hope you find a brain that works.

PS: Yes it can. It's fiction. As long as you fucking don't do it to anyone in real life. Hope it helps.
Do better.

@miipsy

I can’t believe you blocked me lmfaooo I knew you were going to fuck up but I love harassing people like you who can barely give good points still pretend to be the higher being



Oh you’re done? Exactly. I do play video games or rather shooting games but it’s so so very stupid to say it doesn’t affect you. If you have done your “studies” maybe you could have known.

Also from your statements it’s the most recent google searches HAHAHAHA so horrible are your studies. Maybe if you actually studied.

I have a friend who is majoring in computer engineering and working w a game developer, they put up warnings BECAUSE people are likely to get influenced. Stay delusional, see you only “read” but you haven’t been able to prove anything. All of your facts were from the first search on Google which was so pathetic sadly.

@miipsy

You’re even more wrong to say you read it in the “soap opera type satisfaction”. What the fuck was that a valid argument lmfaoo no.

Came across your comment and have to say this is a very solid breakdown on this whole "enjoying problematic content" debate and put it to words I couldn't exactly describe myself especially the last part on how media depicting controversial content needs to rightfully portray it as harmful and show its consequences, such as the psychological impact on the victim or the manners in which society deals with things such pedophilia, incest, murder, rape, or rather fails to adequately address them in some cases. There has to be a conscious approach and not just romanticizing harmful relationships, such as those where an adult grooms a minor, or (in cases such as murder) blindly justifying a character's actions.