i get that him doing what he did was a trauma response, but it'll never make it justifiable (not saying anyone specific said that it did, im jus saying) and to me, the details the artist shows to depict the csa scenes is too much tbh they did the same in the prequel, u can get the point across without redrawing the csa scenes over and over. it seems redundant and like the author just wanted an excuse to draw it
i get that him doing what he did was a trauma response, but it'll never make it justifiable (not saying anyone specific said that it did, im jus saying)
and to me, the details the artist shows to depict the csa scenes is too much tbh
they did the same in the prequel, u can get the point across without redrawing the csa scenes over and over. it seems redundant and like the author just wanted an excuse to draw it