Wtf

Don't care aslong as I have something to read it's better than nothing

Least down bad mangago reader

STFU!! If you hate it some much, fuck off then!! Why the fuck are you still reading it if you hate it so much, and gaslighting those that love it??!!

Lolololol

Everyone in these replies so far are scum. Fucking pedo shit. Seek help. Otherwise, I hope you all don’t come within 100 feet of an elementary school. You don’t have the proper moral instincts to not be freaks around kids.

Well damn... You got waaaay too deep there.

Stfu, not everyone who reads implies it on real life and just reading, and fuck why are you here when literally there are all kinds of people here... you ranting that shit comment doesn't really have an impact on us but just you looking for attention like a whore you are lololol

Your response tells me everything I need to know about you and your level of competence.

Not really. This is fucked and so are you. With how high the amount of child sexualisation is in media today, there’s an obvious fucking problem. Sorry that you can’t see that. I suggest you talk to a professional.

That doesn't justify you knowing everything about me what are you a psychologist?

"everything I /need/ to know"

Care to enlighten what you "know"

Sure, why not? But it will be long. Don't bitch about it, since you asked.

1. "Stfu, not everyone who reads implies it on real life and just reading"
This is the same sentiment as "Fiction does not affect reality". It's a weak excuse, and actually untrue.

A large part of development comes from what we consume, namely from media, as children and so on. Fiction and any type of narrative driven media works with human emotion and morals. Certain movies, shows, books, games, etc, have come to raise and shape people of the current generations. This is why children shows tend to attempt to tell deep topics to children through ways they can understand, and what the best way to deal with them is.

When we talk about media which includes child sexualisation, we can look into other countries which normalise this in their media. Japan, for example, has a high rate of sexual assault and sexualisation of child-like appearances in both fictional contexts, and in real-world contexts. They have a large genre of real-life shot porn which uses actresses who look young, and are dressed in child clothing to satisfy pedophilic fetishes without being illegal. Why is this more common in Japan than America? Because overall child sexualisation is normalised in media, such as anime, so people are conditioned to find attraction to prepubescent body types and mental states.

There is other studies which look at this. It is not a case of "video games make people violent", that is different. It's a case of sexual morality. Even porn can count as fiction, as it is a highly unrealistic media meant for a viewers gratification. Many people who are porn addicted tend to be very toxic in relationships with inflated egos and / or expectations. The fictional impression of porn affected their expectations and preferences for real-world sexual encounters and relationships.

And yes, while not everyone will be influenced by fiction, plenty others will. Is the influence of promoting child sexualisation, even on a few people, reasonable given "Oh! But not everyone will be affected!". I don't think so.


2. "fuck why are you here when literally there are all kinds of people here..."
Because types like me are part of the "All kinds of people". I am part of the entire whole. I find that works being praised which contain extremely problematic and immoral content, and I decide to voice my opinion, even if it is not what the majority here thinks. I do not care if people disagree with me, or hate me. I think it is cowardly to ignore problems, especially when all you have to do is type a message to remind people partaking in this that they are doing something gross.

You are part of the problem. You want to live in an echo chamber where your degraded sense of morals are never opposed or challenged. Even I welcome opposition to my morals and beliefs, because it will allow my stance to become even sharper and more refined. Some people don't care about that, like yourself, but in today's world, morals and critical thought are more important than ever given the amount of problems we have, and the fact that we live in the "Age of Information".

Not so much an explanation of what that tells me about you, but more so and explanation to your question.


3. "you ranting that shit comment doesn't really have an impact on us"
You admit to being close minded, and willfully ignorant. The fact that you have to say this also begs the question; Does it really not impact you?

If it doesn't why do you care? Why did you reply to me? Why do you feel the need to defend yourself?

"Because I want to" may be your response. Obviously I can't predict what you'd really say, but assuming that, then even then, it does impact you. Perhaps not to make you rethink your position, but it affects you enough to have to engage with what I am saying.

Again, this is a weak claim. People will see what I say, and based on how humans work- People will say "It doesn't affect me!" but they are lying. They may be mad, or even somewhere deep, ashamed. They may not reply to this, or engage with it, but they will know that they are willingly consuming problematic content by their own will. The brain is complex, and while you say one thing, it does not actually tell the whole picture. There's a whole lot more going on inside your thoughts that you will never say, and to that I will never know.


4. "-but just you looking for attention like a whore you are lololol"
This is the main one that stands out to me. You don't have an actual response to my words. You're responding to someone saying "This is wrong" with, "You're just looking for attention!"

It's a non-response. And it out of all things, tells me the most. You don't care to actually understand why someone is strongly against this, and why they would speak out, other than for non-existent clout. There is no reward for me speaking here on this site. There is no structure that a usual media platform has, where interaction and following people has purpose or artificial value. In fact, I mostly get people bitching and moaning with their excuses in enjoying content of rape and abuse, desperately trying to defend themself against a single person who has nothing to their name.

The things I say tend to be more personal, given that me interacting with others here does not gain me anything. So more honest, and flawed words are said. It makes people more upset. Why do you get upset? Why do you have to say, "It must be for attention!" even though that makes no sense in this case? Because you are insecure about it. You're creating reasons to satisfy your own narrative, to not have to say "Yep! I enjoy pedo-content, so suck it!" At least you'd be honest then, but you have to get around that, and do some expert reaching to come up with your scape-goats.


And at the end of the day, I will assume like most others that you will indeed not be influenced by anything I have said, to a point that really matters. That's fine, because I have had conversations where I changed someone's perspective, here or in other places, and those few occurrences are more than worth it, even if 90% of the time, I am speaking to a wall and my words don't get across. It also lets me get off some steam, so in the end, it's a win win either way.

If you read all of this, I hope that suffices.

Im not reading it???? Get mentally checked or smthn istg

The attention whore comment came out of nowhere wth. People on here are actually crazy

Yeah, but I am not too surprised by remarks like that lmao. As I said, it tends to tell me plenty about the person making it, lmao. It's deflection babbyyyy

First of all, the way I type is not connected to anything to what I am in real life but is just how I type in this site

Second, You're talking like this is a real life and although yes it's happening in reality but I have boundaries to how much fucked up shits of webtoons I read and does not mean I imply it on real life and Support it

There's a difference in reading and taking action, so if I were to read something gore and killing would you assume me trying to real people too?


Third, although we speak our opinions as you said but do you think your mere opinion could shake the author's way of writing and change it to more family friendly? Do you think you're raising awareness to this site full of "problematic people like me" whether less although some of your opinion have valid points it's still invalidated for 1 person so simply assume them just by their way of typing when you don't know them in person.

It's still in my rights to say You Don't Know Me.

You created an entire essay but lacked evidence to Knowing Me

I never claimed to know you. I will repeat what I said.

Your response told me everything I NEED to know about you.

Not "Your response tells me what your entire character and morals are like"

I don't think you are understanding.

Your responses have brushed off the severity of child sexualisation, and your responses lacked proper reason for your side of the argument, instead attempting to insult me rather than engage with what I was saying.

That is all I needed to know to know that you are someone with a weak moral compass.

I'll respond to your other points however.

If how you type is not connected to you, then how is what you express truthful to your opinion? How is anything that you say hold actual value if it is "disconnected"? If you simply mean the manner of which you speak, well, that is for most everyone. However, if you mean the actual words you are saying- Then why say any of this at all? It is confusing.

I already mentioned that violence and gore is a different subject to sexual morality. That is a proven factor. In media, when we see a high amount of violence and gore, it relates to a thrill, a psychological factor. When we see normalisation of rape, pedophilia, sexual abuse, incest, bestiality, etc, we become accustomed, and even conditioned to lose our natural opposition to it, and it gives the chance for us to even become attracted to it. Again, see the porn industry and how it affects porn addicts. That is a real world example of how fiction affects reality on the topic of sexual morality. I can't say why violence and gore differs, but my guess is because violence and gore does not usually appeal to sexuality, and is only for the shock.

Though, I can also say this;

I read grimdark commonly. It's a genre that explores dark topics very commonly. Trauma from CSA and rape, war with unsettling detail, human trafficking, intense violence and gore, etc.

The difference is that this genre, like others, treats these topics as bad, terrible things.

This work we are talking about did not treat the incidents of a child being exposed to sex and offered sex with the severity of immorality it holds. It normalises it.

There is a difference between thoughts and action, yes.

However, when you allow yourself to be conditioned into thinking problematic things are fine in fiction, it dulls your morality for real world cases too. It opens opportunities for bad developments. This may not happen to you, but it will and already does happen to others.

This is why it is bad. It promotes a normalisation of immoral things.

The author does not know this site even exists probably, so no, I do not expect them to ever see what I say. I don't know where you came to that idea. I also do not want it to be more family friendly. I prefer dark themes and such. I don't prefer the normalisation and fetishsation of those topics however. I want them to be dealt with how they should be.

How am I invalidated for saying, "The things you said let me know already how screwed your morality is" ? I repeat, I did not say or claim to know you in entirety. I claimed to know enough to which was relevant to me given the conversation. The point of that being to express to you that your words from just that message reveal those flaws. A lot of what I have said has been to try and explain my words clearly, as it seems there is an inability for proper understandings here.

Also, an essay? Very original. Again, you asked for me to "enlighten" you, so I did my best to explain. I did not want there to be more misunderstandings through a lack of details.

WTF?? All I said is that you got in too deep with what you said. What's with all this hate and toxicity coming from? Like damn maybe you should go talk to a professional for having these type of thoughts and stereotyping everyone for being a "pedophile" in your tiny mind. Like yes I agree that there is child sexualization and that's something that will never go away because social media and the Internet in general but damn; why the crazy bitch fits. Don't try to school people and expect some type of award for it. But whatever, that's you and IDC what you say about me cuz you don't know me in person, hunty