I appreciate your input, but I disagree with the dismissive tone of your comment. Let it be noted that the message was directed (tagged) to me and only I can speak for myself. Discussing important topics like this is valuable for creating awareness and fostering understanding. While it's understandable that not everyone may want to engage deeply in every conversation, it's important to respect those who do. Let's keep the conversation respectful and focused on the issue at hand. We are not the ones that need your advice which is an overused insult.
I was not going to respond to this topic again because I feel that responding would not contribute to constructive dialogue with the op and who was imposing on me.
.But since you replied. I appreciate your perspective and I was drawing the same conclusion. There was something fishy with this account. Many things you pointed out were suspicious indeed. That is a good response. It is thorough and addresses many points. I think you handled challenging the OP's misconceptions and harmful behavior well.
I respectfully disagree with OP characterization of the situation. Your suggestion that the account in question might be a catfish account is understandable given the seriousness of the accusations and the lack of concrete evidence provided. The accusations made by the OP are serious and should not be taken lightly which stems from lies from cyberstalkers and that is deeply concerning that they allowed themselves to be gaslighted.
It's important to approach these discussions with empathy and an open mind, considering the diverse experiences and perspectives of those involved. Rather than dismissing the use of AI outright, let's focus on fostering understanding and support for those affected by cyberstalking and other online challenges.
Let's strive to create a space where everyone feels heard and respected. Thank you
The dismissive tone of your comment undermines the importance of constructive dialogue. Your message appeared intended to harm, and ignoring it might have been more productive since it wasn't directed at you. It is called having a conversation. Engaging in conversation is a fundamental aspect of online platforms, and every voice should be respected. Rather than dismissing the discussion, let's encourage open communication and mutual understanding. We are committed to our activities here and will continue to contribute as we see fit. This platform is for reading and engaging in meaningful conversation—if that's not what someone is interested in, they are free to disengage. They have a life. What does that say about you? What you did reflects more about you than on them. Why are you scared of long messages when you are literally here to read or if not, that means you are here to talk to people but from that reply maybe you are here to harass others who takes to talk to someone. One day you will understand and want a comment like that. Let's focus on creating a positive and inclusive environment where everyone's contributions are valued
Well done. First time anyone's ever stood up those clowns i.e. "Aloha", "Safety Sentinel", "I love Morning Diamonds aka me" and put them in their place. Must suck to have a taste of their own toxic medicine! I suppose now to punish me, they'll create an alt account for me and start trolling me next. I don't care fools!
It's disappointing to see baseless accusations and misinformation being spread. We are not engaging in any toxic behavior or creating alternate accounts to troll others. Accusing someone without evidence only creates unnecessary tension and division. Let's focus on respectful communication and constructive dialogue rather than spreading false narratives. It's unfair to be targeted with unfounded accusations. Let's move forward positively and leave behind these attempts to create conflict.
"Let's move forward positively and leave behind these attempts to create conflict." It will be nice if you keep to your words. You have been "advocating" for the rights of innocent to safely use the internet. We have all heard you loud and clear. You can now stop the incessant harassment and barrage with your AI generated, lengthy preaches. We really have all had enough of it and we just want to be able to peacefully bitch about Jinx. Just step away from all your alt accounts and go get some fresh air.
I clocked this too. I vaguely remember interacting with one of these troll accounts a few months ago and they were writing full on paragraphs on why there wasn't any rape in Jinx, like 4 pages long worth of arguments. Back then they didn't use AI generated speech, so I think it's one person behind all these accounts, they probably got tired of writing and responding back to arguments so they were like fuck it and began using chatgpt. I think the person behind those accounts just wants the attention they aren't getting irl, best to not interact with them.
I appreciate your two perspectives, but I want to clarify that we are engaging in harassment. My intention is to foster constructive dialogue and advocate for a safer online environment. It's disheartening to be accused of behavior I'm not involved in. Let's focus on discussing Jinx peacefully without resorting to personal attacks or assumptions. Everyone deserves to express their opinions without fear of harassment or retaliation.
It's disappointing to see baseless accusations and misinformation being spread. It is not one person and we don't want attention. We have said stop and leave us alone many times but they don't. both of your characterization of the situation is inaccurate. I can see that as an attempting to gaslight and manipulate me by misrepresenting the situation.
We are not engaging in any toxic behavior. Let's focus on respectful communication and constructive dialogue rather than spreading false narratives. It's unfair to be targeted with unfounded accusations. Let's move forward positively and leave behind these attempts to create conflict.
While the term 'catfish account' is often associated with impersonating someone else online, it can also extend to accounts that engage in deceptive or manipulative behavior, even if they're not directly impersonating another individual. In this case, the term is used to highlight the deceptive nature of the account's actions, such as spreading misinformation, targeting others with harmful intentions, or creating a false persona to deceive or manipulate others. So, when referring to someone as a 'catfish account,' it's not necessarily about directly impersonating another person, but rather about engaging in deceptive behavior or misrepresentation within an online community
Also. It's deeply unfair and unjust to label victims or targets as aggressors simply because they hold different opinions or perspectives. Victims of harassment or cyberstalking are not villains in this scenario; they are individuals who have been subjected to unwarranted attacks, harassment, and false accusations simply for expressing their views. It's important to recognize that everyone has the right to their own opinions and should be able to express them without fear of being targeted or labeled unfairly. Blaming the victims only serves to perpetuate harm and further injustice, rather than addressing the root cause of the issue and promoting understanding and respect within the community
I'm not here to police anyone, but to foster a positive and respectful environment for discussion. It's disheartening to see personal attacks and baseless accusations being thrown around instead of engaging in constructive dialogue. My intention is to promote understanding and awareness, not to create unnecessary conflict. Let's focus on discussing the topic at hand rather than resorting to personal attacks
It's disheartening that peaceful discussions about 'Jinx' are continually disrupted by harassment and attacks. Claiming a desire for peaceful conversation while spreading lies and harassment contradicts this sentiment. I won't be discouraged from advocating against cyberstalking and online harassment. We intend to foster an environment where all opinions are respected, yet we've faced unwarranted aggression. It's unfair to label us as aggressors when we're simply standing up against harmful behavior. Let's refocus on constructive dialogue and mutual respect.
We're simply here to engage in meaningful discussions and share our perspectives. Jumping to conclusions and resorting to baseless accusations only hinders constructive dialogue. Let's focus on the content of the discussion rather than making unfounded claims
I dont think there's any opportunity for meaningful conversation that can be had with chat gpt. If you're actually an alt account and not ai, hopefully you find the help you need mentally, this whole "cyberstalking" thing is unhinged and unnecessary, the only people being cyber stalked is you and your other alt accounts so essentially you're helping nobody, and if you want to help somebody help yourself and log off.
I want to emphasize that I am a genuine user seeking meaningful discussions on this platform. The accusations of having many alt account or AI lack any basis and only serve to derail constructive conversations. Gaslighting tactics won't sway me. It's crucial to recognize that my primary account isn't a target of cyberstalking. We are distinct individuals with our own perspectives.
Instead of resorting to baseless attacks, let's foster an environment where diverse opinions are respected. Rather than trying to force others off the site, let's engage in dialogue with mutual respect and understanding. I'm here to contribute positively to the community, and I won't be deterred by unfounded accusations
How about your group stop attacking people who love or like this series or have different opinions? or take your own advice.
Well, my friend, turns out, we were right with our suspicions. It was a catfish account, and a trap set to spread lies about us and cause further harm. Their actions reek of gaslighting, as they attempt to manipulate everyone around them and inflict harm on those they target.
Noted, they're still resorting to overused insults and the same gaslighting methods to silence people who they disagree with. It's baffling how they contradict themselves within the same comment, dismissing cyberstalking claims while indirectly acknowledging them by saying we are being cyberstalked. We are being cyberstalked, and it's our right to speak up and seek support and justice against such malicious behavior.
It is bizarre to have many people cyberstalk many people but claim they are one person. Their actions of ganging up on one individual and attempting to portray multiple people as a single entity are indeed concerning and could be classified as a form of cyberbullying. By falsely attributing multiple accounts to one person and collectively targeting them, they are engaging in coordinated harassment and intimidation tactics. This behavior is aimed at silencing dissenting voices and creating a hostile online environment.
It's important to recognize that their actions are not only unfair but also harmful to the targeted individuals. By amplifying their numbers and collectively attacking "one" person, they are exerting power and control over the online discourse, effectively silencing opposing viewpoints.
Moreover, their attempts to discredit and label individuals as a single entity undermine the diversity of opinions and perspectives within the online community. Everyone should have the right to express their thoughts and opinions without fear of being targeted or bullied.
It's essential to address such behavior and advocate for a more respectful and inclusive online environment where everyone feels safe to engage in meaningful discussions without fear of harassment or intimidation.
We have the right to speak up. Victims have the right to speak out against such actions and to seek support and justice for the harm they have experienced. It's important to hold perpetrators accountable for their actions and to work towards creating a safer and more respectful online environment for everyone. What does it say when someone is trying to silence the victim? Attempting to silence victims only perpetuates the cycle of harm and emboldens the aggressors to target new victims.
Their responses remain consistent over time, consistently blaming the victims for the actions and lies perpetrated against them. This victim-blaming mentality is unjustified and only serves to perpetuate the cycle of harm. " blaming the victims for the actions and lies from the perpetrators, which again is a form of victim-blaming and is unjustified." and only serves to perpetuate harm.
But here's the truth: we're not the ones at fault here. Like countless others, we've become targets of their harassment, and all we're doing is standing up for a peaceful online environment where everyone can express their opinions without fear. It's undoubtedly challenging, but by speaking out against their harmful behavior, we're taking the right steps towards creating a safer and more respectful online space. Stay strong, my friend, and let's continue fighting for what's right.
Everyone caught up in this "cyberstalking" drama has the exact same writing style, including the victims, and all their text is like mega red flag in terms of being AI-generated. It almost feels like I'm watching an orchestrated drama carried out by a bunch of bots. The motivation of everyone involved is what baffles me the most lol
Edit. I got curious and decided to give these accounts the benefit of the doubt. I ran some of the longer messages from all of these accounts (both culprit and victims) through several AI detection tools. Every single one of them was detected as AI generated, on all tools. I'm just baffled at this point