it is crucial to recognize that many individuals may overlook Dan's trauma and character because they fail to understand that he is a survivor of sexual assault. The person who initiated this conversation has consulted with a rape crisis counselor and is fully aware of Dan's traumatic experiences. Additionally, it's important to clarify that what occurred between Dan and JK does not fit the definition of marital rape, especially considering they do not have a formal relationship, they had none.
Regarding the assertion that Dan was treated as an object, it's essential to consider all perspectives and evidence presented in the story. While Dan's point of view is significant, it's not the sole perspective available.The story does provide clues saying otherwise.
Furthermore, the mention of JK assisting with Dan's grandmother's hospital bills is irrelevant to that comment and even so, does not serve to justify any actions. They were not trying to justify any actions.
Let's focus on understanding the complexities of Dan's experiences and avoid making unfounded assumptions or judgments.
JK being awful or not is your opinion. The comment you are replying to said "It is in fact sexual assault and sexual coercion. (but not rape)" and they added "Terms like sexual assault and sexual coercion are more accurate. " and you are saying "he in fact did SA. " With that, no one will feel like you listen to them and they will think you are looking for a fight and pushing your opinions instead of listening. I am sorry but you are forcing your opinions here. No one is trying to justify anything that can be seen as deflecting instead of admitting the truth. it is important to distinguished between personal opinions and factual analysis. We need more respectful dialogue and mutual understanding rather than pushing personal beliefs onto others
My other account is Safety Sentinel. You are talking to one person. I also oftentimes use Chatgpt just like in my previous replies. Call me a rape defender but I will stand firm on my opinion that Jaekyung never raped Dan.
It's unsettling that there's a belief we are all one person when, in reality, there are three distinct individuals involved. It's important to clarify that there is a clear difference between the targets and the cyberstalkers. By forcing your viewpoint on others, you're disregarding their individual perspectives and autonomy. It's concerning that there's a failure to acknowledge the instances of sexual assault (SA) in the story, but it's not productive to personally attack those with differing opinions. Instead of making assumptions about people's intentions, it would be more beneficial to engage in constructive dialogue and explain our viewpoints. Resorting to personal attacks only degrades the conversation and hinders any chance of mutual understanding.
it cut two sentences off. However, I don't think I have seen anyone genuinely claim that. There is a difference in between genuine opinions and malicious intent.
This ^ is the last comment from them and they only made three comments. The rest is the cyberstalker. Two different people. They are both impersonating the real Morning Diamonds. One is defending MD and other is cyberstalking MD.
This person diamond whatever is a troll, don't reply to them. They're defending rape and making bs reasoning under almost every comment. Just report, block and ignore them.
You're totally right, Jk is a rapist pos, he's a total sociopath that lacks any humanity.
There are two [I love Morning Diamonds aka me} here in this thread. There are four accounts that look alike and all are different persons behind those accounts. None of them are "trolls". Two are cyberstalkers. One is the real one who has not commented in 3 weeks. And the one defending the real one. No one has been making comments on every comment.
it's important to refrain from making sweeping accusations without evidence. No one is defending rape, and it's inaccurate to label someone as a troll without understanding their perspective. It's essential to engage in respectful dialogue and address disagreements constructively rather than resorting to name-calling or assumptions to enforce your viewpoint. It is your opinion that he is one and that is okay and it is okay to only see SA and call him a sexual abuser. Start accepting others will have a different pov than you instead of spreading misinformation and making harmful assumptions, labeling people who want productive conversations.
Let's focus on fostering understanding and productive conversations rather than making unfounded accusations.
if you click on this link from this one https://www.mangago.zone/home/people/3699209/ You will see February 17, 2024 and they are raising awareness about cyberstalking. They only made the first 3 comments.
This is the one defending the real one from the baseless accusations.
If you click on comment from I love Morning Diamonds aka me June 1, 2024 3:48 am and after you will see Join on:
February 21, 2024 They are malicious, they will claim to be "trolling" the real one. https://www.mangago.zone/home/mangatopic/15782941/
This one is the cyberstalker. They will spreading false information or rumors to tarnish our reputation.
sarcat is spreading that false rumors to harm others rep because of different pov. They are part of that group.
I doubt it is a misunderstanding or being gaslighted by cyberstalkers because of something they wrote.
I am happy you tried to discuss the topics with Bam. You were insightful. You are 100% right.
I am happy you tried to discuss the topics with Bam. I think this shows you tried to share information to help Bam understand. Keep it up.
The whole “toxic trope” doesn’t always have to wrap around grape. It’s annoying, like poor Dan, only good thing about this, is the art.