I haven’t read yet, but skimming the comments- looks like uke was a very poor artist who unknowingly took some commissions to make paintings… that turned out to be reproductions of actual crime scenes. The fact that he didn’t know those were real crime scenes somehow got him suspected or something? Like he wasn’t the one who did the crime. Knowing how the crime scene looked was accidental. Not sure. Anyone who’s actually read, feel free to clarify.
Anyway it means, “due to a lack of evidence to support his innocence, he was found guilty”
Ohhhhh. What a weird, weird way to phrase that.
"Due to lack of evidence he was found guilty"...what?