do i really need to explain this shit...
i said one thing (both pairings are weird), and that other person in response pivoted the conversation onto another thing (saying they are not comparable) which is an unrelated point.
so the response is red herring fallacy type bullshit
another way too look at it is that person twisting my point into something els which would be straw man fallacy
ether way its fallacy bullshit.
my point- the depiction of minors in porn is weird.
the ethics of minor x minor vs minor x adult was never part of this conversation, i was never trying to compare.
but this is about sex. everyone is missing op's point, they meant that 18+ stories like this one shouldn't have kids in it. both couples were weird if you wanna be morally correct, an adult shouldn't date a highschooler, and we should not see explicit sex of two highschoolers. it doesn't matter if there's more out there or not, the problem is not that they're having sex, sex is a normal thing, the problem comes when the sex becomes real explicit content, and the characters are underage.
people are bothered by the minor x adult part (and rightfully so), but why is no one bothered by the minor x minor part?
all parings here are weird because porn is aimed at adults