(Lol long convos, multiple users to talk to and different context as well. No wonder youre confused. It was not a big deal tho dw)
Ok back to the topic. Did I mention an apology? Idk... I might missed smth but I did a quick check and I'm pretty sure I did not insinuate such thing? An apology is appreciated ig but not the kind of closure I was envisioning. I was thinking more so of a situation where they just talking it out- calmly this time. You moved on from someone if you are no longer getting affected by them, imo. It's a good way to showcase Skylar's growth through that (again, imo). But again, like how I kept on repeating like a broken record, thats only what I want. I'm not pushing anyone to follow my way. (but I also don't want others shtting on me for... wanting smth fyi so pls keep that in mind)
Did I mention or implied that closure was the ONLY solution to Skylar's trauma? I dont think so.
Last one, about the half heartedly part, it was a huge writing pet peeve of mine. I don't know what more to tell you. I simply find it annoying and theres no grand logic behind it.
Are we clear now? Anymore problem?
“just a disagreement about closure” when your first words to op were literally “you’re already getting flamed and i want to add even more fuel to the fire”. Like if the shoe fits right? And I’m not sure if you were one of them, but there’s folks popping veins calling op “cringe” whilst saying someone else “ate” for just repeating the most popular takes. Like yh they ate air. Oh you think this specific plot device was used correctly? Congrats you agree with the author
Lol since you replied I came back and the way the replies doubled lmaoooo. Flying the “idc” ass attitudes around meanwhile their mentions are HOT and they’re on a reply rampage. You’d think someone stole their firstborn given by how pressed they are. I hope you’re as entertained as I am from reading these.
i know it’s a little hard for you to understand things! but when i said that it, it = op is getting a lot of heat for this and im also bringing my disagreement to the table although many people already said similar things
is that really so controversial lmao? that doesn’t even align with what you said either hun… op’s allowed to have this opinion and i wanted to provide a different perspective because i disagree? it wasn’t about “proving” anyone wrong about how they feel but giving more insight in hopes they see where other people stand. plus from reading their replies from before my comment, i got an even better understanding from op’s thoughts which is why i tried to explain how it makes sense to me. that’s how conversations usually go and it wasn’t as big of a deal as you’re making it out to be when there’s genuinely worse comment sections other than petty disagreements. debate doesn’t = you can’t criticize anything about a story. sure other ppl were aggressive but this was… tame. attitude and harsh words were given but there’s also a block button if op didn’t care to argue?
Block buttons work both ways?? Who would’ve thought. It’s okay to be slow though :P Also you keep projecting this onto other comments sections like this ain’t the oppression olympics it doesn’t excuse being shitty. And I didn’t read all of your replies regarding the subject so idk what conclusion you came to or didn’t with op. Nor was my original comment aimed specifically at you, you’re the one who replied to me first. idk why the last part of my comment got cut off but I ended it with saying that engaging in discourse is one thing but dogpiling and shitting on someone who disagrees with you is another. This is especially considering the plot and majority of the audience are alrdy on your side.
so you’re mad that i’m commenting on your public post that is accessible by everyone? you must not be able to stand the idea of someone disagreeing with you if you’re this bothered by myself and others replying with contrary ideas. you’re saying you don’t care but you’re throwing insults and pulling out the capitalisation so clearly you do? i’m afraid you’re not making any sense, what does “decency” have to do with replying on a public post. what’s hypocritical about what i’m doing? do you know what “hypocritical” means? what’s hypocritical about my replying to you? did i say you can’t reply? no. i didn’t insult you, i just had an opposing opinion. lol i don’t need to move on if i don’t want to, i have time to spare. delete your original post if you're so annoyed by us, but instead you just continue replying and getting madder. it’s hilarious
I said this before and I'll say it AGAIN, I do not mind if you all disagree w me. I totally can agree to disagree ig. What I don't like is how you all are persecuting me for sm >I< 'want' to happen. I was not here going around saying "I'm right, you all are wrong" (unlike some of you ehem).
Basically, I simply said I want closure but here you all coming up at me going "well, youre wrong. Closure is bad." like?? Daym ok?? How do you expect me to react when you unexpectedly get hit by that, huh?
In fact, I care less what you all want. I want smth to happen but you all want other things, simple as that. No need to tell me 'closure' is unrealistic, it does not happen irl and so I was wrong lol cos I. do. not. care. itfp. (and you all shouldnt care about what >I< want THIS MUCH as well!)
If you all find closure bad for some fcking reason, I. did. not. ask. You disagree? Ok. But no need to go so far as discredit what and why I want a closure cos I won't do that to smone I agree to disagree w. Know the difference.
Again! 1. I want what I want. And, 2. I don't need anyone telling me WHY it's wrongggggg to want what I want. Ffs. Can't even comprehend smth that simple?
Is the author fr when they said Minwoo won't be reappearing again? He played his role? He belonged in the past?
Fck. What about closure? They used him for Skylar's trauma plot so now it's ok to discard him? Writers that use trauma as a plot device but do it half heartedly is so triggering to me ugh so annoying