my curiosity...

I disagree that a situation being fictional or whether or not someone has a mental illness should have anything to do with it but all the rest I do agree with you on.

Yes, I realize that I was disagreeing with you on a different thread, earlier, but I think our arguments seem to more closely align with each other's on this particular thread. :D

Yeah, he forcefully silenced him TO AVOID THE SAME FUCKING bullies that you then go on to complain about him overreacting towards in a later altercation. OOPS???

And, again, he forcibly silenced him to avoid those SAME FUCKING BULLIES. Whom you then go on in a disapproving manner to complain about because he broke the chin of one of the bullies because he WASN'T avoiding then at the time. Thanks for proving blackdia's point rather than disproving it like WE are. Oops????

thanks Sachiko! (also yea we might no agree on everything but i'm taking your opinion into account as well!!)
i didn't only respond to op's single-line comment but rather to the original comment. but seems like they don't like to read so next time i won't bother giving my opinion or answer their """"curiosity""""" :)

Hope it was short enough for you as an answer btw! ^^

Yup. It was. But I like both short and long answers. :D

As for the second last comment you made. yeah, I'm gonna mute this topic the next time I have a chance. And it really irks me when someone asks for an explanation and when they get it, in probably the only way that would make sense, they whine about how they didn't get it in the way THEY wanted. I mean, seriously? I can be bombastic but nowhere near as rude as some of these types of posters.

in case you do not understand it, I'm bored by this aggressive attitude (you're showing too, so spare me) every time someone writes something that does not correspond to the extremely predictable psychological basic needs of this chat. My comment stays, if you dislike it, I'm perfectly fine with it. But if you answer me with a million lines-long comment that is rude in its essence, I don't feel like I should reward you being nice in any possible way.

All of you should stop pretending you're playing to the rules and accept when someone says clear that they don't like something. Their dislike does not affect your liking in any way.

The Hitler mention that fascinated so many people( apparently) was a rhetorical figure of speech. The fact that someone took their time being irritated by it instead of asking themselves if the statement made any sense (or not) is amazing.

I'm pleased I've been called rude by one of you (or more of you, yours is the last comment on my section and this time is the only one I read).

Political correctness is the most pathetic thing ever. You're all here defending a bastard and talk about being polite. It's unbelievable.

Btw, when he was a teenager, Hitler was nicer than him.
A despicable character is not meant to be nice. Except in manhwas, where poetical faith becomes automatically a form of idiocy.

It would be interesting to debate this form of art but the nature of the comments itself kills the interest, for me. If we have to be all worried about being rude because blah blah blah, when we're actually talking about an asshole (an HOT asshole, that's it) well, I wrote too much, hope you like it.

Wherever you are, have a nice day.

Perhaps this explains why you don't understand and claim others are being rude when YOU are the one who is being rude: and that is that you CLEARLY don't read or are incapable of reading. So sad. After all, I have REPEATEDLY stated that I am not a fan of Si Woon's character. Where does that fall into DEFENDING him? HMMM...? That's right, it doesn't.

ESPECIALLY since I am disproving your 'point' that everyone seems to fall in love with Si Woon and thinks he can do no wrong. Must not have read THAT part, either, I'm guessing.

And the REASON I said you were rude is because you were. You dismissed clear explanations regarding your OP without explaining as to WHY you still stuck with your original interpretation. Then wonder why someone could POSSIBLY take umbrage at that, when they, up to this point, had patiently AND, yes, COURTEOUSLY spent the time EXPLAINING it to you? And it is THAT response of YOURS which eventually lead to that OTHER comment of yours along the lines of how someone can respond with a great wall of text to your own relatively short comment. HENCE my comment about how it was rude to have ORIGINALLY responded to someone's ANSWER to your question with such a short and dismissive comment from *your* end.

Also, some people take things literally because of a disability they have. So, since it took you up until now to make that distinction, you can either admit to being ableist as well as rude, now, or apologize for making that comparison. Considering how things have been going, I'm pretty sure I can guess which choice YOU'LL make. Amirite? HMMM?

Finally, people have simply been answering your question until YOU decided to make it about something else. And this IS a public forum. So if YOU want people to stop responding in a manner YOU don't like, you can stop responding to people, yourself, because YOU are the one who asked the question, in the *first place, and YOU are the one who drew it into the direction YOU deemed inappropriate in the *first* place. Oops?

Kthxeffingbainow. And, yes, this will be all you hear from me. I can be the better person and keep my promises. Because I'm sure YOU will keep responding to this. So sad, seeing such hypocrisy.