Tf r u yapping about
Drama in the comments. You can go back a few pages to find it ig
This topic is a troll impersonating another user.
These trolls think they have riled me up but I'm calm and serene. In fact, I have counted 6 different accounts from them. In the realm of discourse and debate, one often encounters the accusation of being out of context or irrelevant. This charge, however, is not always justifiable, as context plays a crucial role in shaping the meaning and validity of arguments. In this essay, we will explore the significance of context in argumentation and why denying irrelevance can be a legitimate stance.
Firstly, it's essential to acknowledge that context provides the framework within which arguments gain their meaning and relevance. Without considering the broader context, statements can be misconstrued or misunderstood, leading to faulty conclusions. For instance, an isolated quote taken from a speech may seem incriminating out of context, but when placed within the larger context of the entire speech, its meaning may become entirely different.
Furthermore, denying irrelevance in an argument is often a defense against attempts to dismiss valid points based on tangential factors. Just because an argument may not seem immediately relevant to the current topic of discussion does not mean it lacks merit. In fact, exploring seemingly unrelated angles can often lead to deeper insights and a more comprehensive understanding of the issue at hand. For example, bringing up historical precedents or sociocultural contexts may initially appear irrelevant but can actually shed light on underlying patterns or motivations.
Moreover, the accusation of irrelevance can sometimes be a tactic employed to deflect attention from uncomfortable truths or inconvenient arguments. By labeling a point as out of context or irrelevant, one can sidestep engaging with the substance of the argument and instead focus on discrediting the speaker. In such cases, denying irrelevance becomes a means of insisting on the importance of addressing all relevant perspectives and evidence, regardless of their immediate apparent connection to the topic.
It's also crucial to recognize that what may seem irrelevant to one person or in one context may be highly relevant in another. Perspectives, experiences, and cultural backgrounds shape how individuals perceive relevance, and dismissing something as irrelevant based on one's own limited viewpoint can be a form of intellectual narrowness. Embracing diverse perspectives and acknowledging the complexity of issues often requires venturing beyond the confines of immediate relevance.
In conclusion, denying irrelevance in argumentation is not merely a matter of stubbornness or obstinacy but a principled stance grounded in the recognition of the importance of context and the value of exploring diverse perspectives. By insisting on considering all relevant factors and resisting attempts to dismiss arguments based on narrow definitions of relevance, we foster richer, more nuanced discussions and arrive at deeper understandings of the complex issues we face.
The real user is not in this topic
This is my first comment, the other users in this topic are fakes. I don't believe anything that's said in those paragraphs.
The real user is still not here.
This might be confusing, but this is my first comment. I don't support anything that's been said so far in this thread.
It is a fight against making this a fascist page (Trolls/haters) where only one opinion is accepted or tolerated vs a safe environment where all opinions are welcomed (us).
We should never engage with these individuals on a POV vs POV battle due to them being unreasonable and being abusive. They will gaslight you like crazy.
We have always stood against the fascists saying "See rape or be a rape apologist needing professional help" due to they think the other is ignoring the rape that they see. They can see rape but stop attacking those who are aligned with the story better. If we reverse it no one is calling them a rapist for adding rape to this story. The times we used it were just reversed psychology and normally a question to get them to see what they are doing to us. No, they just think we are calling them a rapist and lash out. Some have lashed out by creating about 6 accounts to impersonate us.
We treated them as readers and tried to work it out to where they made TM, another reader, and someone part of the fandom, a joke.
They have to make anyone a Jaekyung stan and attack them. They always go against the story and make up their own details. This in itself says they know they are wrong and are just here to attack the fandom to make this a fascist place. If you are a Jaekyung stan, that is okay. Attacking someone being a Jaekyung stan is wrong. Making people a Jaekyung stan to attack them is very telling.
We are saying it is sexual assault, sexual coercion, sexual abuse, and abuse. I have many comments saying Jinx is non-con but not rape. They make it where we have seen none of that. This shows there are multiple POVs and how unreasonable they are.
I have stayed here to step in when the fascists attack others then they make it a POV vs POV. They have made other readers characters in the book to attack. They have made their attacks on someone as if it was Jinx. Some of them are toxic and violent.
Now my friends and I hit celebrity status and our adoring fans, they love my friends and me so much that they make about 6 accounts to be my friends and me. They love it when you don't give them attention. I feel so special and loved.
Boy, the trolls...I mean fans.. love me. ٩(๑❛ᴗ❛๑)۶
Maybe we can throw a stick?
If we stop like they want us to you are next. They will go after you and keep this a fascist page. If you stand up to them in the wrong ways, you will go through what we have been through. Forgive us for trying to reason and treat trolls/cyberbullies as human beings who can change their behaviors. We are going to still step in but we are going to ignore their rants and spewing garbage until they can treat others with respect and stop making this a fascist place. We did value their opinions now we don't