for that diamond shit who blocked me

Heyyy, just remember that you're a much better person that MD and at least you know how to touch grass,, unlike midnight diamond ٩(๑❛ᴗ❛๑)۶

That "essay" is the truth and factual. You are talking about yourself.

preach

i looked at your whole profile and almost gagged
the things you say will give me nightmares
im on the trolls side

tyty no matter where i go in life ill always know my mind isnt as fucked as his is

go off queen

Lmfaooo

I know you mean me, the facts and the actual story are so scary for trolls. Trolling is for cowardly people. With the same gaslighting. blah blah blah. ad hominems means you know you lost and are wrong.
But I just noticed you were not talking to me. I should not have responded. I forgot Diamonds is not in my name. So hater alt Ranch and you are talking about the troll who has diamonds in their name. You are just another alt as Ranch is. Please glow up. One day when you learn the truth you will be embarrassed here.

and who has troll in their name?

no one else is making alt accounts unlike ur schizo-ass,, different ppl having the same opinions doesn't mean they're the same person u dumb fuck. Ik no one's agreeing with ur rapist viewpoints so u need to make it look like there's more than one person that shares ur opinion,, what a loser

LMFAO ate him up

If anyone is a rapist is the one adding rape to the story. You are the one with the rapist viewpoint to add rape. So much so that you have to attack someone telling you the truth to keep rape in a story. I am saying it is sexual abuse and sexual coercion.

So if our view-points are similar, you have a rapist viewpoint but that is an ad hominem and you are trolling. People trolling who has the same opinions is just an opinion and it seems none of you can break away from the hive mind to think for yourselves.


ad hominems and name-calling.

Ad hominem: in other words, a personal attack, attacking the person instead of attacking the issue. an example of Ad hominem would be, "poisoning the well" which is the direct attack on the trustworthiness of the person making a statement instead of addressing the statement.

Ad hominem refers to attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself."

They must not have a very good argument with the imposing and ad hominems.


Thank you for sharing you know you are wrong and lost.
if you are resorted to insults you know you lost.


Name-calling: the use of abusive names to belittle or humiliate another person.
he use of offensive names especially to win an argument or to induce rejection or condemnation (as of a person or project) without objective consideration of the facts. Name calling during an argument is often a sign of emotional escalation.

Because they have run out of intelligent and creative ways to defeat the other person in the argument . Immaturity - some people never grow up. Communication breakdown is often caused by poor communication and poor anger coping skills, which leads to name-calling and insults. It is an immature person’s method of dealing with frustration.

Emotionally mature people understand that name-calling and insults are counterproductive when it comes to solving issues. because they want to control you by making you feel less, to make your ability to win the argument because they want you to be less secure in what you're arguing about

It's a power move

Name-calling is drawing at straws trying to get the other person started name-calling them back and lowering the playing field for both of them.

Your insult is about you. You can't define me. You can only define yourself.

Thanks for sharing you know you are wrong and have to scoop low to defend your opinion to have rape in a story.

It was actually a loser move to say you have no arguments, that you lost in the debate or attack on me, whatever, and you will be talking about yourself too there or since you want rape in the story you will attack and degrade others in desperation to force your disgusting opinion. Why do you want it to be rape?

Never mind, trolls opinions and "laughter" have no value.

Literally a quick google search "Since consent given under coercion isn't freely given, it doesn't count as consent. It follows, then, that coerced sex (when it involves penetration) would count as rape, even if the other person didn't use physical force or violence." Also I'm gonna block YOU and not interact with u again bc i block people for peace of mind and not bc i feel powerful doing so,,, have as much of a life as u can u fake ass victim

Ranch house more lame trolling?
""Since consent given under coercion isn't freely given, it doesn't count as consent. It follows, then, that coerced sex (when it involves penetration) would count as rape, even if the other person didn't use physical force or violence." "


Okay. That is not in the actual story. if you are trying to make the quote support you, the actual story debunks you and you are cherry-picking.
If there is rape it is chapter 44, Jaekyung was drunk and could not consent. Dan was willing to take advantage. Dan is the rapist, right? Legally and morally, Jaekyung could not consent.

I deserve to be treated with respect, kindness, and good-faith engagement. Stop gaslighting. More name calling. I am getting dogpiled by trolls who hate the truth. I am your victim. What is happening is not acceptable and you need to take responsible for your bad behavior.

yes i will glow up
but i dont think you ever will, sadly
THOSE ESSAYS TAKE YOU ATLEAST 10 MINUTES lord id guess you have no real work so thats how you spend your days

go off!!

slay couldn't have said it better

true!!

We need more people like you!ヾ(☆▽☆)