Been thinking

you when say everything i said is true and you when you still say your points stand. absolute clownery.
authors can formulate what they imagine and fantasise into their art and when i critique said art as to imagine and fantasise better so that it doesn’t normalise abuse and rape and make violation an inevitability then im the problem for explication? be fucking serious. how you think it is possible to produce work for the public and not have the public have opinions on said work is pure stupidity. do you think these authors and works are babies you must protect? you think the aob genre having always been problematic and therefore must stay that way? when fantasy genre was heavily criticised for only having white characters and none of colour to which the adaptations of those works had to be revised to add characters of colour, you think it should have stayed having no characters of colour? and also, these fantasies that authors implemented into art came from where if not real life? the authors and the works produced by them were pulled out of thin air and also exist in a vacuum? entire aob trope fell from the sky?
what “you people” who beg on your hands and knees to never have to look critically at one work of fiction in your entire life need to do is grow the fuck up.
sure it’s just a work of fiction but so is the bible. works of fiction has historically been propaganda but also for just as long it has been resistance because what fiction has never been is apolitical. i don’t know what delusional fairytale gutter you holed yourself up in to sit in the dark and say that “representation be damned” and to stop “decrying” authors’ works when it is worth decrying because it is giving defensive. if you like the manga and want to see ian rape noah at least a dozen more times before it magically becomes love then go ahead who can stop you. not me that’s for sure. but if you’re going to try and argue that the entire trope of aob must exist in this manner of glorifying rape and violence because “it is the setting” then at least have the critical thinking skills to not die on a hill so short and shallow. you’re beating your own argument like a dead horse into the ground. and for what? so you can remain delusional? pathetic.
you arguing that it is “tough” because “it is the setting of an omegaverse” due to “their nature” is a point of contention i have refuted multiple times on the basis that 1. animals do not behave that way. if all you know is dogs jumping on you with “their eyes glazed over” then me specifically telling you that they do not behave that way in their mating rituals should have you knowing more. but you still don’t. why? because you. don’t. listen. and can’t use a search engine from the looks of it. perhaps you should read a book, maybe something non fiction to open your eyes.
2. you can’t argue for their nature whilst discarding the rest of their nature that doesn’t suit your argument. if it is in their nature to be prone to hurting each other it would be in their nature to find ways to safeguards against it because outside their “beast mode” they are just like us which means the rest of their “nature” removed from reproductive behaviours are comparable to human or else they wouldn’t live in clearly human worlds because for every reaction there is an equal and opposite reaction. so them having inhibitors and etc are not because of their “beast modes” for we have all equivalents with abortions and birth control and we most certainly do not have “beast modes”. if anything it argues that they are rarely reduced to just their nature but live in a world of advancements that cannot be if their nature is all there is to them. so im gonna touch your hand when say this: these measures exists because people, being more than their nature, has autonomy outside of reproduction, hence in aob where they also have these measures are proof of the fact that they exist beyond their nature.
since you are adamant that they lose all control and executive function then the point of them being accommodated for it being implemented into policy even more necessary. and on that note are you sure that you want to say losing executive function or consciousness “animalistic” because again for the billionth time: animals don’t do that in mating and humans who do do that are disabled or those with neurodivergency. of which accommodation exist in abundance even if access is limited. is the ableist and derogatory labelling what you wish to go for to make your point that has no legs nor any logic? are you certain?
on the point of betas not giving a fuck, the policy changes i proposed will have economical impacts like producing jobs. betas are people who have jobs. betas who in your argument doesn’t care about people would still care about doing their jobs. and educating people, running helplines, producing or designing technological advancements that allows people a greater quality of life are all jobs. plus in what human civilisation do people not give a fuck about each other? the entire purpose of living in society is that humans survive better in numbers. and almost every single person i call a friend would help somebody in need. in fact the majority of my friends run and support mutual aid within their community as well as internationally due to genocide on the daily. so whilst you’re picking up a book perhaps choose one that explains emergent theory but i doubt you will because it would seem that logic is not a sinking ship and you seem to prefer those.
every problem you have proposed i have found an answer for. any problem you can think of i will find an answer for. me who has never created my “OWN shit”. thus the problem, as i have said multiple times, is that i who can imagine and fantasise this shit on the top of my head, i, who has not created my “OWN shit” can think of ways to make it better, but the authors who are paid to imagine and fantasise won’t then the problem is not that they are unable but that they don’t want to. and to practice critical thinking is to question why the fuck is it that across millions of aob works on hundreds of formats/platforms that not one bitch thought damn wouldn’t it be good if i didn’t glorify rape and romanticise violence like all the others that came before me. is that line of questioning simple or are you still stuck on that dead horse? therefore the conclusion is it is not tough. not even if we were to indulge your adamant proclamation that it is “their nature” because, in your words, it’s just fantasy in fantasy land. yet the fantasy lands are all the same? lmao then are they even imagining and fantasising or shitting the same shit that has been shat a million times before.

What are you ON about? There are PLENTY of ABO works that doesn't evolve around r***?!?

If you can't accept their works. Go else where. Nobody's forcing you to read this stuff.

And the fact people are cruel to each other exists. Sure. You can take a fraction of ppl on earth and they will be helpful. I'm not saying NO ONE is helpful, but there are scenarios, many will stand by and do nothing, because they don't care, are scared to do it, or thinks someone will help but no one does. Ofc on the human spectrum, there will be those who are pacifists and those who are proactively helping against atrocities, and those who are those who are commiting crimes against humanity. You're acting as if policies that don't pertain to a particular person would actually make them be interested or invested. People sit on the sidelines if their interest isn't involved. Not EVERYONE is out there to champion a cause.

And why did critical thinking has to come into play, when literally these are created for enjoyment, not to bust a nut over real life stuff.

You're just making everything difficult and unenjoyable. Why are you having these lengthy debate over a a minute subject?

Everything is political if you make it so. Stop questioning shit and get out of here.