No one id gonna force you to read it so problem solved.
Why do kids on this website always think that critique needs to be met with THIS exact comment every goddamn time?
At least make it make sense.
This (aka me not reading it) doesn't 'solve' anything since the faults still exist and I voiced them as a warning to other readers (which is what a post like this is for, which I asume you do not know based on your comment).
If this is not a problem for you and others, that's fine, but readers who like coherrent writing and do NOT like wondering where tf the next correct speech bubble to read is WILL find this info important before reading.
If you like it, good for you, but people read comments to get an idea of what is waiting for them in a comic or comment general thoughts to start a discussion while/after reading.
If you don't like me pointing out issues, just downvote my comment and leave: Problem solved, right?
Right they sound like toddlers that have only learnt the words "don't read it then"
Exactly. XD
I'll not comment on the wonky anatomy but what I find weird is the panels.
In some moments panels do NOT make sense when read in the regular japanese fashion and on the next moment they do. This throws people off when reading tbh and the somewhat weird translations do not make it better (they are not exactly Google Translations from what it seems, but some speech bubbles are definitely not accurate given the conversation they are having).
It feels like this author is rather new, which they somewhat are since they started publishing in 2013, but there are a few issues they need to work on.
I can deal with the wonky, stick figure-ish anatomy (tho it's definitely not my thing), but the panel issue is definitely something they need to fix for their comics. Unless, for some weird reason, whoever scanlated this flipped the page. That COULD maybe explain things, but I doubt that this is what happened.
I'm almost certain that the story telling is okay, but it's honestly hard to tell with the translation being off so many times.
It seems interesting at it's base, but I'm on the fence for reading this given the panel issue (IF it should keep happening, that is).