The point was that she didn’t know the ml. They’d never had a conversation therefore she never got to know what he was like. She even admits this herself. So even if she saw his reaction to her death she has no idea what his motivations were. It literally could’ve just seemed to her that he was insulted by being given a dead bride. Any bias about him she had before would’ve just been confirmed then the ADDED betrayal of her brother. She’s working on learning about one person while unlearning everything she ever knew about the other
No I understand all of that, and I’m not saying it’s wrong for her to have dug into the ml but it’s like the author totally disregards the brothers clear intentions to harm her and do whatever he plans to do.
The issue I really have is writing out of convenience. If you were in her place would you have let what your brother did slide so easily and go TEN years without digging up information and putting plans in action. She did nothing but “hone” her abilities and then she continuously let people trample over her. And that would be cool if I knew she had a secret agenda that she had been slowly working on and putting into action but that’s not the case. She spent ten years researching a man that wasn’t her family’s down fall. It was literally her brother.
Sorry maybe I should read the rest but I am just so frustrated by ch 10 that I don’t want to even try to read more.
It’s just not my cup of tea I guess. I’m not knocking the writing the art or the story I’m just pointing out an obvious plot hole that irks me.
Though I hope I’m wrong and you tell me so but I will not be reading the rest.
How she could consider canach her enemy after seeing his reaction to her death and that the main perpetrator was her brother. Like the author had her spend ten years learning about an enemy that she had no clue if he was truly her enemy or not, and doing nothing about the person she KNEW wanted her dead.
Y’all that makes zero sense.