I don't remember what happened, but I'm too lazy to read it again lol
She acts angry now, because he just watched her. But she was acting all over the top because she squeezed information out of his servant, finding out that he doesn't enjoy loud and brash people.
She tried to make him dislike her, so she wouldn't need to reject him, knowing she couldn't argue about it. So he would need to reeeeeaaally dislike her presence. He knew about her scheme beforehand, yet only stopped her after she had already made a fool out of herself.
Again, she tried to fool him. He simply let her try.
What was he deceiving her on? Isn't she angry for the servant that he only watched her help him rather than being proactive about it?
No, she's angry at him. Of course it's only my understanding of the situation, but she's obviously saying she's angry because he let her go on and on, even though he knew the truth beforehand.
Why ask me where he deceived her? I'm saying he didn't really do it. But she acts as if he did.
Ah I understand what you mean now, I think I misread the situation entirely. I do agree now that it's a bit odd for her to be seemingly angry over that, it's a bit out of character from what I can remember but I hope it'll be more clarified in the next chapter
Yeah, I mean she would have to, as they likely can't get around talking this out. If I'm wrong, that would be nice, but I don't feel like the servant could have been meant. Realistically, servants that are important enough to be treated and talked about like the man who got the gloves, would be paid well enough to afford a pair of gloves themselves. Saying he's at fault for the guy not wearing any would be a bit ridiculous. And there's nothing else it could be attributed to.
But yoh, you can't be angry at him now. You were the one deceiving the bro first, now don't get it fucked up.