Yeah, no.
Ridiculous that you went there.
A person murdering a pet and eating it without even being hungry? A supposed "noble"? That's pure incongruity. Killing and eating someone's pet? I doubt that's acceptable anywhere.
If someone is hungry I see nothing wrong with eating whatever or even whomever. Survival comes first.
Eating a dog? It seems to be socially acceptable in China, Korea, Vietnam...
But in my culture that is not common or acceptable. It's something someone does in famine, starvation, extreme poverty or mental illness. And since it seems to be the same in many, many other countries this sht should come with a warning.
Also. I liked the dog, it was cute and I got attached. Fiction or whatever, it's unacceptable the dog being murdered. (╬ ̄皿 ̄)凸
Dude. Eating dog meat when starving is something they do in my country. Eating dog meat regularly? That's something they do in China and those other countries I wrote. Culturally acceptable there. Not here or many other countries.
F#ck off.
That's your bias trying to see something you think on others.
(︶︿︶)=凸
That motherf#%ker in chapter 9 and 10.
He killed and cooked the dog.
F#ck this $h!t.
I read that it was dog meat they were cooking and held the hope it was a "faking it to hurt the protagonists". It seems it wasn't.
The baby's holding themselves up, the mother's revival and fast death, the servants dying (omited). Ok. It's fiction. Whatever.
The dog being murdered by a "noble", being cooked in the garden in an open fire, the prince taking a walk on what seems to be the duke's garden?
Well. The unacceptable thing is the dog being murdered.
(╬ ̄皿 ̄)凸