after further digging, simon is the cardinals name hdkdhdkdj
from what ive gathered from ch75, the mother was preggy with ippolito and was not married at the time so she lived with simone to avoid prosecution since unmarried preggy women are detested.. whilst living with simon and having plans to run away with ippolitos father, she got preggy with arabella tying herself to the de mare family.
but when u think about it... if this were rlly the case... that would mean... during that time... in order to stay with simon, she had to make it that the child shes carrying is simons right??? since she was scared of letting the current simon find out.. that would also mean that isabella is not simons daughter since the mother specifically said that arabellas birth made her prevent from running away from the man who ruined her life (aka simon)???
its just so weird that during this revelation there has been an isabella erasure hdkdnfkfj
But then can't she just say Arabella is also her lovers child ( to the lover). Cuz if everyone thought ippolito was the Cardinals son, then having Arabella makes no difference ( as for others all three kids belong to the cardinal and running away with three kids instead of two doesn't make a difference) unless the lover rejected her after knowing Arabella is the Cardinals daughter?.. (╯°Д °)╯╧╧
I really don't get it. If the mother had ipolito as a love child then that must mean that she was married to the cardinal and had affair with the man named Simon. Then why does having Arabella matters? No one except her would know who Arabella belong to so she could have just claimed her to be Simons as well and still run away with him...i don't get anything here. Is it the translation or is it the way the author intended? ╮( ̄▽ ̄)╭