Responses
Mf a scholar
OK I SAID WAY MORE THAN THIS WTF IS MANGAGO TRYNNA DO, ANYWAY TY FOR THE LINK AND THIS IS THE REALEST COMMENT
This is the first non silly comment I see of toilet terrorist and it's a scholarly comment !&%$&@!? You are so real for this comment
Theres studies that prove we dont have a seperate channel for processing fiction and reality and the 'fictive pass' makes us susceptible to real changes in the way we view real things. This is shoujo so its already directed at a YOUNG female audience if we trivialise an inappropriate relationship between a child and an adult whos to say that these young girls wont start to this that this sort of content might warp their view of appropriate boundaries between a child an an older person?? Not to mention this comic romanticises the idea of having young and vulnerable children be attracted to you, are we making being innocent and young even more fetished?? Japan already has a serious issue with publicly sexualising children (both prepubescent and adolescent minors) why are we trying to justify this mangakas content?? This is clearly some weird predatory fantasy and a completely inappropriate relationship just like SO (iykyk). We shouldnt defend this BS
Thank you to synfull for all of these.
https://research.library.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=international_senior
Thompson J, Teasdale B, van Emde Boas E, Budelmann F, Duncan S, Maguire L, Dunbar R. Does believing something to be fiction allow a form of moral licencing or a 'fictive pass' in understanding others' actions?