Actually there are ppl who are justifying this and making pedo comments and have exposed themselves as one.. Like the comment section has weird ppl like let’s keep it a buck.
Hahahaha yeah it's like they're exposing themselves. Like none of the readers justifying anything... It's just some little dumb story when we were kid and some of that kids have a crush on someone older than them. None of the readers justifying anything... It's kinda funny when when there were a real life cases of pedophilia, grooming, child abuse, people like thay mostly stay silence (⊙…⊙ )
Yall forget most shota is a cyber sex crime and just because this one is only sexually suggestive doesnt make it ok
I mean... Yeah it's depend on the person. I'm the type that what fiction is a fiction and stay as a fiction. But my moral compass from REAL LIFE IS CLEAR. But i knew when i should put a line between my real life cases and just a simple fiction. Like they're literally just drawing, why would i fight for them instead i can use my energy to any other things like real cases that happen in life?
But it's also okay if some ppl kinda have their own principal when it comes to their reading stuffs, like it's okay if they have the same moral compass in their real life and in fiction. Just as you said, i just take it as a simple fiction... Why would i "fight" an invisible fight LOL
In REAL LIFE CASES right? Yes pedophilia via cyber crime do happen. But with real life people right? That's why it people can get punished for targeting real, living people. Because they're a literal criminal.
But if by the logic that people who made a story about a child who's having a crush to an highschool students, then you put it in the same LEVEL AS ACTUAL REAL CASES CYBER SEX CRIME WITH REAL PEOPLE AS THE VICTIM, does that even the same? Like you wanna bring it to the court cause it "indicated" a fictional 2D drawing kid in a sexually suggestive way...?? Who even think of that... Many of the comments didn't even portray the MC A LITERAL KID IN A "sexually suggestive" way. They just simply portray this as simple fictional story. They knew how to separate drawing 2D cartoon characters with a real human being. But if you have the same moral compass as real life cases and your reading stuffs, then it's okay, i don't think people even care about that. You don't like it? Then leave it. Just as simple as take it or leave it.
Dude? I meant digitally illustrating child pornography, uploading or creating it is a cyber sex crime where i live. I never said i wanted to bring this to court i mentioned the cyber sex crime because while this isnt illegal its still creepy. The comments arent being sexually suggestive, the mangaka is, this is clearly predatory content. I mean they've even been drawn kissing. This isnt about seperating reality and fiction i know theyre not real, sexualising a fictional character made to be a child is rooted in pedophilia. Which is a massive issue, the mangaka is the real creep along with those weirdo commenters who are saying they want to see tsubaki and yuu have sexual contact .
I'm in that group where we know the content is unacceptable or controversial We don't approve it IRL but still read it otherwise 'cause it's a fiction.
The only debate here is, does the story has pedophilia or grooming on it. We have different opinion when to consider one. But if it has, does it matter? If it doesn't then so be it. We read what's interesting and dropped those we're not.
We don't debate if it's right or wrong because WE ALL FCKING AGREE THAT IT IS NOT!
Yeah i know that illustrating child pornography is weird and morally wrong, no sane person would support that, we don't even need to debate abt that cause we are know that's a wrong thing.
"sexualising a fictional character made to be a child is rooted in pedophilia" it can be true or not, this is a hypothesis that needs a scientifically empiric datas. Most of fictional characters (especially in a manga) don’t look like an actual person, but if some people being in a delusion and think that an actual child looks like a fictional child is not an impossibility. That's why it's overwhelmingly observed that attraction to minor fictional characters is no hint for pedophilia. There are many factors and deliberations to prove and decide whether one person is a pedophile or not. Maybe it can become a trigger if someone already has a tendency for being a pedo they will do a crime sooner or later whether they know or like to sexualized fictional characters or not BUT it's not always a key factor. You can't just say someone who likes a child fictional character is a pedophile.
Anyway what weirdos comment that saying they want to see the them having sexual contact? Cause i don't see it atm idk if they already deleted it or not or maybe i just didn't see it(?)
I dont think thats the point i believe its because they know it IS a child that its rooted in pedophilia, theres lots of evidence for and against this so whether you believe it or not is an opinion. I think that the fact that it is a child and they want to make it sexualised is rooted in some sort of pedophilic desires that they have no way of channelling but throught his. Fictional characters dont usually look like actual children but they are meant to seem extremely similar to them, making them exactly the same would be too much effort i mean even adults in manga dont look like actual adults. I think the sexualisation of a fiction child is rooted IN pedophilia but i dont think that makes the mangaka a pedophile it makes them predatory. Pedophilia is such a complex mental illness so we all know that being suggestive about a kid in your drawing doesnt automatically make you one, i just say the mangaka is practically a pedophile as an exaggeration because of what they create. Theyre obviously a predator, i dont think they'll directly harm actual children but they create content that caters to pedophiles for sure, as does anything that makes something to do with a child remotely sexual. People who are sexually or romatically attracted to children characters for sure need to be put on a watchlist, preferably mentally evaluated, its just not ok to normalise or trivialise that sort of behaviour. I think because its fiction and not pornographic material it doesnt make them a pedophile at all but they could probably have some sort of subconcious desire they project onto fiction, not a healthy way of redirecting issues.
The weirdos are in the later part of the comment section, not sure if they deleted it tbh because they got an extreme amount of hate.
Bruh maybe actually look for the pedo comments in here? Wdym none of the readers? Like have u seen the type of ppl that be commenting here? Because there are ppl who claimed to be one. ALSO I’m sorry but I’m someone who has been sexually assaulted as a BABY so yeah I definitely speak bout abuse of children, idk about some other ppl tho.
As i said before i don't see the comment so maybe they already deleted it/? Idk..
And I'm sorry for what you've been through. Again, i don't support criminal behavior, i already said it in another comment, i have a clear moral compass for what happen in real life cases. So i always stan with the victim. But for the fiction or lika pixel 2D characters? It's still in the grey area, it can't be a key point indicator to decide someone's is a pedo or not cause there's need an scientific empiric data to proof that hypothesis. That's my point, i DON'T SUPPORT anything that include a criminal behavior from REAL LIFE CASES.
From that comment (which i don't see about... So i assume either i skip it without me knowing or they already deleted it) that said has the indication that they're support pedo behavior or is a pedo themselves, it's another problem. The one I'm criticized is how people can't separate real life cases and fiction. Or people who are hypocrites like they read a story about an kid MC and God who is 2647839493 years old, fallin in love, but when they read some kid having a crush on teenager boys, that's where they draw the line?
Yooo no one is justifying this hahaha. We didn't say it was right in the REAL Life nor it's something justifiable. Everyone knows it's something in the gray area, but everyone also knows it's fiction.
If you can't read something without having the ability to distinguish what's real or fiction then that's on you.
Don't drag everyone else down for having the ability to do so. If you can't read something and be mature and stop being such a baby or a bitch about it, the least thing you could do is shut up about it.
Other people are just happy with a Shota Manga that's fluffy with no explicit activities and rape on the first chapter.
Obviously this is not morally right but I prefer to take it as simple fiction and enjoy the story after all it's a simple manga, If you're fine with the shota or you like it, read it and if you don't, go read something you like instead of criticizing other people and looking for a fight