The cliche fl who values all human life and would spare the life of a "misguided rapist/mu...

She killed someone before as well but this time i find her reasoning reasonable. Because she is not claiming that that person doesn't deserve dieing but she is preventing him because she is aware that his reasoning skills are not good enough to differentiate between real need for murder and his "necessary style" murder. She needs to stop him to calm his "urge to kill". Not that she doesn't believe he shouldn't kill the rapist

Exactly someone who tried to rape/kill her. Honestly if that's not a good excuse to kill then I don't know what is. I just don't like that it's not utilizing the context of situation to justify things. Don't say never kill again, no matter what the situation is. Even if he is an ex-hitman, it should be fine to kill if it means protecting yourself and others. Especially in a time/place where there are no authorities to act according to the law. Plus she's lived a sheltered life, she has not lived the full experience of a commoner traveling alone in unfamiliar territory. I like her but there should be exceptions to the no kill rule.

I agree . Like i said i would let this one slip as well.I am also against "never" kill someone. If i were their situation i would kill him too.


But i also understand how she doesn't want him to hold the knife when she know that he almost killed someone dear to her with his defective sense of danger.

And most importantly she is not against killing the rapist, (she killed one too) ,but rather she is against him killing anyone. İ respect her choice even though I also find it annoying and I would also say "honey , you can kill this one :-) "


Wish the author didn't include this part and just let him kill the rapist though.

I agree. I just see this as a troupe for changing your bad boy boyfriend. I guess it's a requirement for stories like this. This is one of the reason why I like stories where the bad boy continues to be a bad boy while in the relationship. ╮(￣▽￣)╭