It's called Stockholm syndrome for a reason

EXACTLY ITS NOT MAKING ANY SENSE . It’s like me reading killing stalking and then I get upset when there’s killing and stalking in it.

KEHEJSJEBEJJDB NDJSNSNDN

People are aren’t upset that there’s killing and stalking, or Stockholm syndrome in the manwhas, it’s the fact that it’s being romanticized, glamorized, and being seen as one commenter said “cute”, that’s when it becomes a problem, and that’s exactly what kind of response their getting, obviously people are going to be upset and they have a right to be. Your comment is ignorant and harmful.

Naw because it’s literally not glamorizing anything. The author is doing a great job of showing how wrong this is . If you take what you just read as cute your the problem not the manga.

My comment is not ignorant nor harmful all I said is for people to read the title and to not be surprised when the plot turns dark

The ain’t for a right to be upset it’s literally about stock home syndrome but they gonna be upset when they start to catch feelings.

Actually no. If you think the fact that he is getting beaten up and that the ML says he wants to break him cute the problem isn't me or the author. It's your own perception. Don't forget also, that people have kinks and that roleplay is a thing. You can consider something hot in fiction and not tolerate it in real life. Clearly I'm not the ignorant one here :)

Ok let me rephrase myself, I didn’t say that the author was glamorizing it, I’m implying that the fan base is. The author doesn’t have much control over what their fan base thinks, but they can take preventable measures by not adding so many explicit scenes ??,, I’m aware that people have kinks, but the author has a choice to feed into them. Some of these scenes are unnecessarily explicit and some of them aren’t even needed. I said your comment was ignorant because it is, as I said before, people aren’t mad that there’s Stockholm syndrome in the manwha it’s self, but they’re mad that it’s being romanticized by the audience. If you were to take a look in the comments, you can see people calling it “hot” him getting beat up “cute” worst of all, people shipping them. and I guess that parts on me since I wasn’t very clear.

Yeah well that’s not what they made the comment about Genius they made The comment about people complaining about the Stockholm syndrome . Which if you were to read the comments there are a lot of people who are upset about it. That’s why they said do you guys read the title. Now that you look goofy go take a walk of shame back to the snowy mountains because you’re a Snow flake

Ummm I think you’re mistaken LOL ? Like dude, people aren’t complaining that there’s Stockholm Syndrome???? That’s what they expected when they read the title. They’re upset that the AUDIENCE and AUTHOR are contributing to the FETISHIZATION of Stockholm syndrome…..

Not to mention the fact that the same happened in killing and stalking, whereas the audience were pro shipping the two main characters despite it being a case of Stockholm syndrome as well. If you don’t see the problem then I don’t know what else to tell you ???

As I’ll say again this comment wasn’t about that what else do you want me to tell you? Me and the original commenter saw people complaining about the stock home syndrome . You saw people complaining about the other person calling it cute. Idk how that makes this comment ignorant. There addressing one topic while your addressing another . Why did you feel the need to comment when that’s not what there talking about . You look hecka goofy

Lol, I’ll say this for the last time, people aren’t complaining about the Stockholm syndrome, they’re upset that this is legit trauma porn

So your telling me your read every single comment? Because I bet you didn’t because I saw a ton of people complaining about the plot and how he’s stupid if he falls for the seme and other things . You just can’t admit that you were wrong and that this comment has truth behind it. How you gonna tell me the comment I saw, maybe you saw different ones than I did ever think about that? I’m not talking about the comments that are mad about the other comments get that threw your thick skull

I can’t understand what half of this says…..If you’re going to insult someone then at least look up the difference between threw and through….or maybe your skull is too unbearably thin to even comprehend what I even said.

Stop changing the subject.your wrong end of story

You’re arrogant, and refuse to get the big idea of what I’ve said. I have repeated myself numerous times, can you not make sense of it ??,?? I genuinely can’t understand what your replies are saying at this point, each reply gets more and more disoriented…What truth are you talking about dude ?

Bruh your the only arrogant one. All I said was that I saw comments actually mad a the stock home syndrome but you always replied with “there not mad the the stock home syndrome,there mad at the people romanticizing it” but i actually saw people mad at the stock home syndrome. But your trying to tell me I didn’t witch is arrogant. That’s why I said they shouldn’t be surprised when the title is what the book is about