i agree with you here. i read the story and only afterwards said rape. it wasnt something i focused on. but it was rape. them saying it wasnt bc the uke liked it is bullshit. "the uke was turned on it wasnt rape" would mean that rapists saying the girl was wet means she liked it. its a physical reaction. not consent. again i agree with you the other person clearly tries to pass off rape ass consent without real proof
If the author wanted to make it rape, why was the sex so explicit? It's obviously a sexual fantasy, not a story about the horrors of rape. Stories like this one have their own little genre called male futanari, cunt boy, cb. They are fantasy stories and the reason they show the couple having sex is because it is a sexual fantasy.
You're the ones projecting rape onto the story. obviously
I kind of find it attractive-- I mean the Seme personality was shit but... Idk? It just show how obssessed he is with uke I wanna see some more of this but sound like a toxic relationship, if only the Uke and Seme is like this then it doesn't matter.