But we all know that in this story, even if Medea is harsh in her own ways, she's intelligent; she won't do unnecessary brutal nor lie to that extent if not necessary or if she just wants to. She weighs how bad those nobles' doings are. What she always do is like 'an eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth'. The reason why she's always like that is because the antagonists in the story also act like total sc*ms. Also, if she's not to present a witness, those nobles might escape. And it's not like what she did is worse than what those nobles did. After all, her witness is still present during that time, resulting to him being basically aware of the real tragedy. Meanwhile, Psyche is just being too idealistic, whining just because Medea's method is not a 'norm'. Besides, what can she do instead?
Wtf, I didn’t know someone in real life would seriously think that. You must be sheltered
I understand that, I spoke not only looking at the what I already know but also objectively looking at the perspective that "others" Mobs. If prejury is done like medeas did other can do it as well then in a bad thing, and if this deed is normalise and accepted. Its a cylcle then, how can people judge nor weight the truth and false if this is continue wether the cause was good or bad?
I know what Medea's is doing this for the sake of not letting those people get away, they deserve to be punish to death, I acknowldege that.
But objectively without bias bc we readers know what is the truth, I look at the perspective of a mob as a observer/lawyer/citizen whatever the results it's still prejury.
How can you proceed to trust someone if the evidence is a lie? the verdict can even adjourn. It was a luck that one aristocrat spoke from their mouth the deed. That is a guarantee hellgate. Because he himself confess the crime, that's a real right evidence.
That's why is the end justify the mean or vice versa is always interesting and ongoing debatable statement
I'm side of Psyche. Thinking if Medea's method is always like that and justify that the end justify the mean in this scenario, then does that mean that the possibility of other doing that too (forgery) is acceptable?! whether it be use in good or bad cus it can happen again then, medea did it so do others can . I don't want to accept/normalize that as right may it be fictional or rl. What make that kind action different to that sc*m aristocrats.
Maybe that's why Dekis is there to become the REAL EVIDENCE so save Medea's lies. Though the deed is already done. If they found out then they can say that EVERYTHING that Medea state from the start is also a Lie. Ah but that one aristrocat spoke from his mouth that they did it so maybe they'll continue to go to hell. But Medea could be imprisoned.
I like this manwha because the perspective of the two MC always clash, it's so amusing to read ヾ(☆▽☆)