God, I wanna kill Lucita >:( It's her fault that the child died

Aominecchi0831 May 17, 2016 12:55 pm

God, I wanna kill Lucita >:( It's her fault that the child died

Responses
    My ideal knight_Igris April 3, 2020 9:24 am

    Yeah and all he did was scold her...... she should have been put to jail! Or just straight up assassinated!(╯°Д °)╯╧╧

    Comadrin May 30, 2020 8:47 am
    Yeah and all he did was scold her...... she should have been put to jail! Or just straight up assassinated!(╯°Д °)╯╧╧ My ideal knight_Igris

    No kidding. Are these characters even human? Their emotions and reactions are so unrealistic it's ludicrous. One girl smells my roses, so I sick my doberman on her. Another one is maliciously the direct cause of my unborn child's death, so I will tell her she's behaving badly. Now everything is sweetness and light.

    Nishikadochan June 26, 2020 2:17 am
    No kidding. Are these characters even human? Their emotions and reactions are so unrealistic it's ludicrous. One girl smells my roses, so I sick my doberman on her. Another one is maliciously the direct cau... Comadrin

    He called off the dog when he realized she wasn't paparazzi. So he didn't set the dog on her for smelling his roses.

    I personally was pissed off that she went ahead and picked one for herself. That was rude of her.

    And while I do agree that Lucita is awful and ought to be punished, it's not as if she deliberately murdered an unborn child. She did something terrible, and is an awful person, but she had no way of knowing that telling that awful lie would end up killing that baby. She's an awful heartless person, but she's not a murderer.

    Comadrin July 5, 2020 11:16 pm

    So a girl with no camera is a paparazzi and is therefore the perfect subject to be mauled by a large dog, when there is a testosterone filled neanderthal right there who could subdue her without wrinkling his designer clothes? Interesting take on it. Neither is picking a rose in a rose garden without permission a crime for which the perfect punishment is mauling.

    I said that she was maliciously (I take it that no one has denied her malice in her filthy lies to a vulnerable pregnant woman) the direct cause of an unborn child's death. "Direct" was the wrong word; In fact, I intended to use the antonym "indirect," so you are quite correct in that matter. If that was what made you feel that I called her a murderer, then I apologise for my error. She did, in fact, not murder the unborn child. She was, however, the cause of its death. She could not be tried under the law (at least the laws I know as an American). Aside from her own conscience, supposing she has one, the only real punishment she could receive would be if the circumstances became known. Spanish aristocracy is admittedly somewhat snotty (is there actually an aristocracy that ain't?), but public knowledge of her actions would require her doting grandfather to have the combined fortunes of Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Vladimir Putin, the Saudi Royal Family, and all of the fictional Harlequin gazillionaires to make her accepted in society again.

    The point I was trying to make in the original post was not that she should be thrown off his battlements, put in jail, or even beaten up. The point was that it was unbelievable that a man who cried over his injured dog would immediately be calm, magnanimous, and understanding about the death of his unborn child and the near death of his wife (whom he supposedly loves to distraction) due to juvenile jealousy. Had it been me, my sense of objectively viewing what happened would have flown out the window, and for the present, I would have pretty much lost my mind! And I am a curmudgeonly American, and not a passionate Spaniard (although I can definitely be passionate, not that that is a fact germane to this discussion).