buts that kinda what he did? ha made him a servant, remember, theo was a nameless slave before, a servant will get payed, he will get food, a place to live and will not be mistreated. while chloe is a PRINCESS, theo is just a normal boy, why would he be immediately adopted by a noble or a knight? what chester did makes sense in that world. but we see it from chloes eyes. and you gotta remember, the whole royal family were cursed to not care about or trust anyone right?(or something like that), why would he then care about a nameless boy?
Forreal, it felt so slimy, Theo was there for her through her whole struggle and this is how he is rewarded? This got me heated asf
Because he's their dear sister's precious friend. Even if they don't care about a nameless slave, they should recognize that Chloe really cares about him. If they could notice all that stuff about her trauma and how she's sensitive to her surroundings and how she won't ask for anything for herself, they should realize that she cares about Theo's wellbeing. When her brother pointed a sword at his neck and she screamed for him to leave him alone, that should have been clue number one. When she asked for him to be given a name, that should have been clue number two.
Right? I really feel like Chester said fuck it because he didn't like how close Theo and Chloe were. Like he immediately saw a boy next to his sister and attributed mature thoughts to a child. Like heavy Freud vibes here. If Theo had been a girl, I bet the situation would have been different.
They knew exactly what they were doing when they made Theo a servant. Chester was jealous of Theo for being close with his sister. He claims to love Chloe, but if he really loved her, he would have done everything in his power to make his sister's best friend comfortable! Why didn't they make one of the knights adopt him to begin with? Why wasn't he adopted? Like for real that makes me so mad.