I had to just quit after chapter 4 because the flash wasn't for getting so annoying and so...

Who killed who?

So in like chapter 1 you can see her stabbing him in his sleep but in chapter 4 she said he died in battle

That image was just an example.

she's grieving not stabbing.. i think u saw it wrong...

There is a blade coming out of his chest with blood coming out her hand on the blade

That image was part of the story read chapter 1 again

Excuse me? I said it was used an example. It was used an example. I don’t think you understood me?

So rude.

Example of what how she killed him you need to explain more cuz I'm really not understanding do you mean prologue

And if that is what you're saying that makes it worse because if anything the prologue should at least line up with the first two three chapters of the story at least the method on how the ML died should be the same

How am I rude for not understanding your vague statement

It’s not a vague statement. I’m saying it just as it is. It’s not difficult to understand. That image was being used as an example of her having to kill her husband, it displayed what she would do. But obviously, she didn’t end up killing him, and he died in the war.

What sense is that make though, what would be the serving purpose of her giving an example of how she might have killed her husband in the first chapter where we learn about the FL pass before she was reincarnated, that makes no sense considering parts of chapter 1 literally lead into scenes in chapter 2 by the way she doesn't even say it was an example nor does the manga anyway elude to that one image out of that entire chapter being an example

It makes sense. In the manwha they use many images to describe the words. Like the principality war, what the saintess looked like when she was younger, when they showed an image of the saintess and were introducing her, when her brother said that the king “might kill Leticia” and it showed the king choking her, they are all examples. That image didn’t actually happen, but its still used to illustrate what *could* happen in the context that the king actually did kill FL. They do not need to be directly stated as examples, and she does not need to state it’s an example either...

No those are not examples those are details of her past that the author shows before showing us when she's reincarnated so that we the reader can have better understanding of the situation out FL is in which is why the first few slides of the first chapter shows us seeing her get a burn from her mother splashing her with hot tea only for us to later see that moment get brought back up in a later scene to give us context on where in time she is , except that scene with him choking her was not a part of her past though that was brother visualizing how she could get killed, which is why he says "she MIGHT get choked"and the picture is black with a white outlines drawn in the background while the brothers face is in the foreground while the image of her stabbing him does not have any suggestive language and is in full color taking up a scene of its own

I absolutely give up. You’re just a mentally stunted. I JUST EXPLAINED THAT UTS A GODDAMN EXAMPLE OF WHAT CPULD HAPPEN. DO YOU KNOW WHAT EXAMPLE MEANS, YOU DUMBASS?! Drop the story. I’m trying to help you understand, but you rejected me and what the other person said, so you obviously don’t want better understanding if all you’re going to do IS FUCKING REFUTE REFUTE REFUTE. SHUT THE FUCK UP.

You ANNOYING ASS BITCH.