So basically what your saying is "ignore the facts that sukuna raped Megumi and enjoy the dj! It's fine to like it!" even though Megumi is a minor (15 years old) while sukuna is 1000 years old am I correct? Or did I read something wrong?
Also can you explain in detail roseberryblush? I'm actually confused on what you're saying. No hate by the way I'm confused.
Ah that make sense but this is a pedo ship am I not correct? There's a limit to what can and cannot be lewded in anime/manga. A lot of child molesters started out with just a "fictional show" as well or _if you don't like then don't watch/read". I suggest to not ship this since you are also supporting a pedo ship ^^
hi there! basically, megumi is forced to have sex with sukuna in this dj- it’s kinda obvious that he isn’t really willing to sleep with him, he just does it for yuuji. i’ve seen comments complaining about megumi being underage without mentioning that. it’s kinda weird to complain about one thing but not about the other - why select? Isn’t rape also bad? That’s why I mentioned hypocrisy... sorry I’m not good at explaining... ;;
Okay I just finished what you send so now. . . Here what I think
"I look at it this way - it’s fiction and it hurts no one. Does seeing fictional violence hurt anyone in real life? Does fictional crime harm anyone in real life? No, because it’s fiction. In fiction you can do anything, even the impossible" - from a stranger
Now I want you to read every single thing I copy and paste.
"Under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, sections 62-68 made it a criminal offence to be in possession of "prohibited images" of children. This is defined closely to require that the image is first grossly offensive and obscene, and p/rn/graphic for purposes of s3xual arousal. it also requires that the focus is principally on the child's g3nit4ls and s3xual regions, or includes one of various s3xual acts either with the child or in the presence of the child. It also covers images that depict s3xua activity in the presence of or between children and an animal, whether dead, alive, or imaginary
"Under federal law child porn is, and 1 quote, "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting" that "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is 'obscene", or "depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in..sexual intercourse...and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."
"Images of child p/rn/graphy are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child p/n/graphy as any visual depiction of s3xually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age)."
Now look it this way even if it is "it's just fiction, it doesn't affect reality" you don't get to make that claim that for everyone.
Ah I understand what you mean but he is still a child. Just because he mature as a character still mean he is a child. Basically your saying thing like "He is mature so he is not an child" but in the anime or manga he is STILL an 15 years old. Same thing to Sukuna he is still 1000 years old in the manga and the anime.
I do not have anything to said for the horror fantasy since I do not have a excuse.
Hello again! I really get where you are coming from - and I ofc now the laws about child pornography and how to “define” it. Megumi is included in violent acts such as killing, fighting, blood, gore, death etc. is it fine to consume that then? I don’t wanna say that I’m comparing that with child pornography. But making a child fight demons and such is just as horrible OO
Plus the real thing isn’t acceptable ofc... it’s just weird for me that the one thing is acceptable and the other isn’t??? (At the beginning of this thread, I was talking about rape. Some people where just complaint about the age gap, not the rape which seemed strange to me)
So we are kinda talking about two different things here ;;; still I really understand you like I personally don’t want to read stuff where a character is clearly depicted as a child (Boku no pico style etc.) - while I’m fine with characters who seem more mature and are clearly depicted as a character who aren’t underage, despite being underage... people who enjoy the more extreme genre such as mentioned before, ok do what you want as long as you don’t hurt others (i know we are turning in circles rn but I think the argument of fiction/reality is really valid)
People will be concerned about kids fighting, like in almost every shonen too... (I hope I never came across as harsh or offended, I agree with a lot of point with you, that’s why I always find myself struggling in the media I consume - people are just really fine with high school kids killing each other in all kinds of anime and no one seems to argue about that which just seems strange to me haha TT)
Loved reading your well thought out comments.
I think to answer your first question, people will pick on the subject matter that makes them the most uncomfortable, sometimes ignoring other problematic scenarios.
But yeah, at the end of the day, it's fiction. As long as your know where the moral line is, I think everything is fine. I think I only get worried when people start seeing problematic stuff in real life as okay (like they think stalking someone is cute, etc).
That law about cartoons/ drawings doesn't apply to every country. I don't live in the states, but I think I remember reading somewhere that it doesn't cover all the states either.
Also, the law is quite arbitrary. The number of published books that have depictions of minors having sex is quite high. You look at books like IT (orgy) or game of thrones (rape) which all had underaged sex.
It's fine if that makes you uncomfortable. But I think things aren't quite as black and white as people make it out to be.
thank you for your nice response! It really helps me because I’m really affected somehow by what other people think. I wanted to be more mindful about what media I consume and enjoy - knowing that what I think isn’t all that wrong really relieves me! And I feel the same, any kind of stuff I’ll read in reality would just creep me out so much. Most relationship in manga, webtoon etc. are toxic but since it’s just so unrealistic and well, fiction just like you said, it’s easy to “enjoy” it instead ...
This is just a preview. The artist is on twitter @zoozzzo! You can find their pixiv too.
A lot of people are saying it’s nothing to enjoy because Megumi is still underage. But why aren’t they complaining about Sukuna literally forcing Megumi to have sex with him? He’s trading Yuuji’s safety to Megumi- yeah we don’t know how the sex will actually go but it’s clear that Megumi likes Yuuji, and detests Sukuna. Isn’t this being hypocrite?? I’m also not looking to start a fight or anything, I’m really just curious..?. ;;;