That’s a dangerous advice you got there. You know a reader can admit this is rape but still read the story and recognize that the others aspects are well done, right? I really don’t see the point of looking for other interpretations in order to think « oh this is not rape this is fine » since it’s your right to be hooked to a story despite the rape. Admitting it and moving on with your day is way more healthy than not aknowledge rape scenes.
Since the problem IS downplaying rape: for example, making up interpretations in order to show the rape as non existent or ambiguous
« for this kind of BLs (and I mean psychological) just follow the MC’s thoughts and how he perceives that » —> nop, that’s not how things work: if you see a murder in a story you are not gonna say you can’t call it murder because it’s useless to « throw reality into this » right? So I don’t see why you would do it for rape. BY LAW, you can sentence a rapist whether or not the victim has some thoughts that would lead to otherwise. Because by law, you are a rapist if you didn’t get clear consent, that’s just it. It’s way simpler that most people let you think it is (no interpretation, no BS)
Saying this because again, I don’t know the age demographic here. But having sex with someone when they’re unconscious IS rape. Just saying. Carry on.